Preserve the order of READ_REGISTER and WRITE_REGISTER

At the present time, we don't have a way to represent general dependency
relationships, so everything is represented using memory dependency. In order
to preserve the data dependency of a READ_REGISTER on WRITE_REGISTER, we need
to model WRITE_REGISTER as writing (which we had been doing) and model
READ_REGISTER as reading (which we had not been doing). Fix this, and also the
way that the chain operands were generated at the SDAG level.

Patch by Nicholas Paul Johnson, thanks! Test case by me.

llvm-svn: 237584

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
index 3c5d32f1749..48bf22699b0 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
@@ -4045,16 +4045,20 @@ SelectionDAGBuilder::visitIntrinsicCall(const CallInst &I, unsigned Intrinsic) {
     return nullptr;
   case Intrinsic::read_register: {
     Value *Reg = I.getArgOperand(0);
+    SDValue Chain = getRoot();
     SDValue RegName =
         DAG.getMDNode(cast<MDNode>(cast<MetadataAsValue>(Reg)->getMetadata()));
     EVT VT = TLI.getValueType(I.getType());
-    setValue(&I, DAG.getNode(ISD::READ_REGISTER, sdl, VT, RegName));
+    Res = DAG.getNode(ISD::READ_REGISTER, sdl,
+      DAG.getVTList(VT, MVT::Other), Chain, RegName);
+    setValue(&I, Res);
+    DAG.setRoot(Res.getValue(1));
     return nullptr;
   }
   case Intrinsic::write_register: {
     Value *Reg = I.getArgOperand(0);
     Value *RegValue = I.getArgOperand(1);
-    SDValue Chain = getValue(RegValue).getOperand(0);
+    SDValue Chain = getRoot();
     SDValue RegName =
         DAG.getMDNode(cast<MDNode>(cast<MetadataAsValue>(Reg)->getMetadata()));
     DAG.setRoot(DAG.getNode(ISD::WRITE_REGISTER, sdl, MVT::Other, Chain,