[SelectionDAG] Teach BaseIndexOffset::match to unwrap the base after looking through an add/or

We might find a target specific node that needs to be unwrapped after we look through an add/or. Otherwise we get inconsistent results if one pointer is just X86WrapperRIP and the other is (add X86WrapperRIP, C)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54818

llvm-svn: 347591

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGAddressAnalysis.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGAddressAnalysis.cpp
index 8c57f18183e..488bac1a9a8 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGAddressAnalysis.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGAddressAnalysis.cpp
@@ -107,14 +107,14 @@ BaseIndexOffset BaseIndexOffset::match(const LSBaseSDNode *N,
       if (auto *C = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Base->getOperand(1)))
         if (DAG.MaskedValueIsZero(Base->getOperand(0), C->getAPIntValue())) {
           Offset += C->getSExtValue();
-          Base = Base->getOperand(0);
+          Base = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo().unwrapAddress(Base->getOperand(0));
           continue;
         }
       break;
     case ISD::ADD:
       if (auto *C = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Base->getOperand(1))) {
         Offset += C->getSExtValue();
-        Base = Base->getOperand(0);
+        Base = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo().unwrapAddress(Base->getOperand(0));
         continue;
       }
       break;
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ BaseIndexOffset BaseIndexOffset::match(const LSBaseSDNode *N,
             Offset -= Off;
           else
             Offset += Off;
-          Base = LSBase->getBasePtr();
+          Base = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo().unwrapAddress(LSBase->getBasePtr());
           continue;
         }
       break;