Fix spelling noticed by Duncan.

llvm-svn: 176023

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
index 81b0ea7e7bc..db8ae6ea06e 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
@@ -3867,7 +3867,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAG::getMemcpy(SDValue Chain, DebugLoc dl, SDValue Dst,
                                 unsigned Align, bool isVol, bool AlwaysInline,
                                 MachinePointerInfo DstPtrInfo,
                                 MachinePointerInfo SrcPtrInfo) {
-  assert(Align && "The SDAG layer expects explicit alignment and reservers 0");
+  assert(Align && "The SDAG layer expects explicit alignment and reserves 0");
 
   // Check to see if we should lower the memcpy to loads and stores first.
   // For cases within the target-specified limits, this is the best choice.
@@ -3935,7 +3935,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAG::getMemmove(SDValue Chain, DebugLoc dl, SDValue Dst,
                                  unsigned Align, bool isVol,
                                  MachinePointerInfo DstPtrInfo,
                                  MachinePointerInfo SrcPtrInfo) {
-  assert(Align && "The SDAG layer expects explicit alignment and reservers 0");
+  assert(Align && "The SDAG layer expects explicit alignment and reserves 0");
 
   // Check to see if we should lower the memmove to loads and stores first.
   // For cases within the target-specified limits, this is the best choice.
@@ -3990,7 +3990,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAG::getMemset(SDValue Chain, DebugLoc dl, SDValue Dst,
                                 SDValue Src, SDValue Size,
                                 unsigned Align, bool isVol,
                                 MachinePointerInfo DstPtrInfo) {
-  assert(Align && "The SDAG layer expects explicit alignment and reservers 0");
+  assert(Align && "The SDAG layer expects explicit alignment and reserves 0");
 
   // Check to see if we should lower the memset to stores first.
   // For cases within the target-specified limits, this is the best choice.