diff options
author | Matthias Braun <matze@braunis.de> | 2015-07-16 22:34:16 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Matthias Braun <matze@braunis.de> | 2015-07-16 22:34:16 +0000 |
commit | 3cd00c17396dd786d533ba71dafdcab9a7694804 (patch) | |
tree | 98555ff515628864ac05b51daa9448347407f2a4 /llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp | |
parent | 7e5de9c96beb1bb47a34d974c7939bf37c2c5605 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-3cd00c17396dd786d533ba71dafdcab9a7694804.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-3cd00c17396dd786d533ba71dafdcab9a7694804.zip |
Fix __builtin_setjmp in combination with sjlj exception handling.
llvm.eh.sjlj.setjmp was used as part of the SjLj exception handling
style but is also used in clang to implement __builtin_setjmp. The ARM
backend needs to output additional dispatch tables for the SjLj
exception handling style, these tables however can't be emitted if
llvm.eh.sjlj.setjmp is simply used for __builtin_setjmp and no actual
landing pad blocks exist.
To solve this issue a new llvm.eh.sjlj.setup_dispatch intrinsic is
introduced which is used instead of llvm.eh.sjlj.setjmp in the SjLj
exception handling lowering, so we can differentiate between the case
where we actually need to setup a dispatch table and the case where we
just need the __builtin_setjmp semantic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9313
llvm-svn: 242481
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp index 51057a0fecb..0396736ad81 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp @@ -1264,6 +1264,7 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(SDNode *Node) { case ISD::FRAME_TO_ARGS_OFFSET: case ISD::EH_SJLJ_SETJMP: case ISD::EH_SJLJ_LONGJMP: + case ISD::EH_SJLJ_SETUP_DISPATCH: // These operations lie about being legal: when they claim to be legal, // they should actually be expanded. Action = TLI.getOperationAction(Node->getOpcode(), Node->getValueType(0)); |