Use new TokenFactor chain when merging stores

If the stores are storing values from loads which partially
alias the stores, we could end up placing the merged loads
and stores on the same chain which has the potential to break.
Each store may have a different chain dependency on only some
of the original loads. Create a new TokenFactor to capture all
of the required dependencies of the stores rather than assuming
all stores can use the same chain.

The testcase is a situation where this happens, although
it does not have an observable change from this. The DAG nodes
just happened to not be reordered before despite this missing
chain dependency.

This is based on an off-list report for an out of tree target
which regressed due to r246307 and I haven't managed to find a case
where the nodes do end up reordered with an in tree target.

llvm-svn: 248468

1 files changed, 29 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
index c9914fa0f17..ad60b8244f1 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
@@ -407,6 +407,7 @@ namespace {
     SDValue getMergedConstantVectorStore(SelectionDAG &DAG,
                                          SDLoc SL,
                                          ArrayRef<MemOpLink> Stores,
+                                         SmallVectorImpl<SDValue> &Chains,
                                          EVT Ty) const;
 
     /// This is a helper function for MergeConsecutiveStores. When the source
@@ -10817,11 +10818,15 @@ struct BaseIndexOffset {
 SDValue DAGCombiner::getMergedConstantVectorStore(SelectionDAG &DAG,
                                                   SDLoc SL,
                                                   ArrayRef<MemOpLink> Stores,
+                                                  SmallVectorImpl<SDValue> &Chains,
                                                   EVT Ty) const {
   SmallVector<SDValue, 8> BuildVector;
 
-  for (unsigned I = 0, E = Ty.getVectorNumElements(); I != E; ++I)
-    BuildVector.push_back(cast<StoreSDNode>(Stores[I].MemNode)->getValue());
+  for (unsigned I = 0, E = Ty.getVectorNumElements(); I != E; ++I) {
+    StoreSDNode *St = cast<StoreSDNode>(Stores[I].MemNode);
+    Chains.push_back(St->getChain());
+    BuildVector.push_back(St->getValue());
+  }
 
   return DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR, SL, Ty, BuildVector);
 }
@@ -10846,6 +10851,8 @@ bool DAGCombiner::MergeStoresOfConstantsOrVecElts(
       LatestNodeUsed = i;
   }
 
+  SmallVector<SDValue, 8> Chains;
+
   // The latest Node in the DAG.
   LSBaseSDNode *LatestOp = StoreNodes[LatestNodeUsed].MemNode;
   SDLoc DL(StoreNodes[0].MemNode);
@@ -10863,7 +10870,7 @@ bool DAGCombiner::MergeStoresOfConstantsOrVecElts(
     assert(TLI.isTypeLegal(Ty) && "Illegal vector store");
 
     if (IsConstantSrc) {
-      StoredVal = getMergedConstantVectorStore(DAG, DL, StoreNodes, Ty);
+      StoredVal = getMergedConstantVectorStore(DAG, DL, StoreNodes, Chains, Ty);
     } else {
       SmallVector<SDValue, 8> Ops;
       for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumStores; ++i) {
@@ -10873,6 +10880,7 @@ bool DAGCombiner::MergeStoresOfConstantsOrVecElts(
         if (Val.getValueType() != MemVT)
           return false;
         Ops.push_back(Val);
+        Chains.push_back(St->getChain());
       }
 
       // Build the extracted vector elements back into a vector.
@@ -10892,6 +10900,8 @@ bool DAGCombiner::MergeStoresOfConstantsOrVecElts(
     for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumStores; ++i) {
       unsigned Idx = IsLE ? (NumStores - 1 - i) : i;
       StoreSDNode *St  = cast<StoreSDNode>(StoreNodes[Idx].MemNode);
+      Chains.push_back(St->getChain());
+
       SDValue Val = St->getValue();
       StoreInt <<= ElementSizeBytes * 8;
       if (ConstantSDNode *C = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Val)) {
@@ -10908,7 +10918,10 @@ bool DAGCombiner::MergeStoresOfConstantsOrVecElts(
     StoredVal = DAG.getConstant(StoreInt, DL, StoreTy);
   }
 
-  SDValue NewStore = DAG.getStore(LatestOp->getChain(), DL, StoredVal,
+  assert(!Chains.empty());
+
+  SDValue NewChain = DAG.getNode(ISD::TokenFactor, DL, MVT::Other, Chains);
+  SDValue NewStore = DAG.getStore(NewChain, DL, StoredVal,
                                   FirstInChain->getBasePtr(),
                                   FirstInChain->getPointerInfo(),
                                   false, false,
@@ -11360,6 +11373,10 @@ bool DAGCombiner::MergeConsecutiveStores(StoreSDNode* St) {
   if (NumElem < 2)
     return false;
 
+  // Collect the chains from all merged stores.
+  SmallVector<SDValue, 8> MergeStoreChains;
+  MergeStoreChains.push_back(StoreNodes[0].MemNode->getChain());
+
   // The latest Node in the DAG.
   unsigned LatestNodeUsed = 0;
   for (unsigned i=1; i<NumElem; ++i) {
@@ -11369,6 +11386,8 @@ bool DAGCombiner::MergeConsecutiveStores(StoreSDNode* St) {
     // latest store node which is *used* and replaced by the wide store.
     if (StoreNodes[i].SequenceNum < StoreNodes[LatestNodeUsed].SequenceNum)
       LatestNodeUsed = i;
+
+    MergeStoreChains.push_back(StoreNodes[i].MemNode->getChain());
   }
 
   LSBaseSDNode *LatestOp = StoreNodes[LatestNodeUsed].MemNode;
@@ -11386,12 +11405,17 @@ bool DAGCombiner::MergeConsecutiveStores(StoreSDNode* St) {
   SDLoc LoadDL(LoadNodes[0].MemNode);
   SDLoc StoreDL(StoreNodes[0].MemNode);
 
+  // The merged loads are required to have the same chain, so using the first's
+  // chain is acceptable.
   SDValue NewLoad = DAG.getLoad(
       JointMemOpVT, LoadDL, FirstLoad->getChain(), FirstLoad->getBasePtr(),
       FirstLoad->getPointerInfo(), false, false, false, FirstLoadAlign);
 
+  SDValue NewStoreChain =
+    DAG.getNode(ISD::TokenFactor, StoreDL, MVT::Other, MergeStoreChains);
+
   SDValue NewStore = DAG.getStore(
-      LatestOp->getChain(), StoreDL, NewLoad, FirstInChain->getBasePtr(),
+    NewStoreChain, StoreDL, NewLoad, FirstInChain->getBasePtr(),
       FirstInChain->getPointerInfo(), false, false, FirstStoreAlign);
 
   // Replace one of the loads with the new load.