diff options
author | Evan Cheng <evan.cheng@apple.com> | 2010-05-19 01:08:17 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Evan Cheng <evan.cheng@apple.com> | 2010-05-19 01:08:17 +0000 |
commit | abd0ad54a475bffd74ad67bf66aa0a060523ccab (patch) | |
tree | fc7bb88098c16c96e3cccba0dea26f85e52aa11e /llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp | |
parent | 58c6f21453aff3b6d2cbf1ac08a96107c1d68718 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-abd0ad54a475bffd74ad67bf66aa0a060523ccab.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-abd0ad54a475bffd74ad67bf66aa0a060523ccab.zip |
Intrinsics which do a vector compare (results are all zero or all ones) are modeled as icmp / fcmp + sext. This is turned into a vsetcc by dag combine (yes, not a good long term solution). The targets can then isel the vsetcc to the appropriate instruction.
The trouble arises when the result of a vector cmp + sext is then and'ed with all ones. Instcombine will turn it into a vector cmp + zext, dag combiner will miss turning it into a vsetcc and hell breaks loose after that.
Teach dag combine to turn a vector cpm + zest into a vsetcc + and 1. This fixes rdar://7923010.
llvm-svn: 104094
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp | 81 |
1 files changed, 75 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp index bfa302cf095..347024f0ae4 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp @@ -3570,7 +3570,7 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitSIGN_EXTEND(SDNode *N) { DAG.getVSetCC(N->getDebugLoc(), MatchingVectorType, N0.getOperand(0), N0.getOperand(1), cast<CondCodeSDNode>(N0.getOperand(2))->get()); - return DAG.getSExtOrTrunc(VsetCC, N->getDebugLoc(), VT); + return DAG.getSExtOrTrunc(VsetCC, N->getDebugLoc(), VT); } } @@ -3591,9 +3591,7 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitSIGN_EXTEND(SDNode *N) { N0.getOperand(0), N0.getOperand(1), cast<CondCodeSDNode>(N0.getOperand(2))->get()), NegOne, DAG.getConstant(0, VT)); - } - - + } // fold (sext x) -> (zext x) if the sign bit is known zero. if ((!LegalOperations || TLI.isOperationLegal(ISD::ZERO_EXTEND, VT)) && @@ -3732,8 +3730,48 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitZERO_EXTEND(SDNode *N) { } } - // zext(setcc x,y,cc) -> select_cc x, y, 1, 0, cc if (N0.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC) { + if (!LegalOperations && VT.isVector()) { + // zext(setcc) -> (and (vsetcc), (1, 1, ...) for vectors. + // Only do this before legalize for now. + EVT N0VT = N0.getOperand(0).getValueType(); + EVT EltVT = VT.getVectorElementType(); + SmallVector<SDValue,8> OneOps(VT.getVectorNumElements(), + DAG.getConstant(1, EltVT)); + if (VT.getSizeInBits() == N0VT.getSizeInBits()) { + // We know that the # elements of the results is the same as the + // # elements of the compare (and the # elements of the compare result + // for that matter). Check to see that they are the same size. If so, + // we know that the element size of the sext'd result matches the + // element size of the compare operands. + return DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, + DAG.getVSetCC(N->getDebugLoc(), VT, N0.getOperand(0), + N0.getOperand(1), + cast<CondCodeSDNode>(N0.getOperand(2))->get()), + DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, + &OneOps[0], OneOps.size())); + } else { + // If the desired elements are smaller or larger than the source + // elements we can use a matching integer vector type and then + // truncate/sign extend + EVT MatchingElementType = + EVT::getIntegerVT(*DAG.getContext(), + N0VT.getScalarType().getSizeInBits()); + EVT MatchingVectorType = + EVT::getVectorVT(*DAG.getContext(), MatchingElementType, + N0VT.getVectorNumElements()); + SDValue VsetCC = + DAG.getVSetCC(N->getDebugLoc(), MatchingVectorType, N0.getOperand(0), + N0.getOperand(1), + cast<CondCodeSDNode>(N0.getOperand(2))->get()); + return DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, + DAG.getSExtOrTrunc(VsetCC, N->getDebugLoc(), VT), + DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, + &OneOps[0], OneOps.size())); + } + } + + // zext(setcc x,y,cc) -> select_cc x, y, 1, 0, cc SDValue SCC = SimplifySelectCC(N->getDebugLoc(), N0.getOperand(0), N0.getOperand(1), DAG.getConstant(1, VT), DAG.getConstant(0, VT), @@ -3889,8 +3927,39 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitANY_EXTEND(SDNode *N) { return SDValue(N, 0); // Return N so it doesn't get rechecked! } - // aext(setcc x,y,cc) -> select_cc x, y, 1, 0, cc if (N0.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC) { + // aext(setcc) -> sext_in_reg(vsetcc) for vectors. + // Only do this before legalize for now. + if (VT.isVector() && !LegalOperations) { + EVT N0VT = N0.getOperand(0).getValueType(); + // We know that the # elements of the results is the same as the + // # elements of the compare (and the # elements of the compare result + // for that matter). Check to see that they are the same size. If so, + // we know that the element size of the sext'd result matches the + // element size of the compare operands. + if (VT.getSizeInBits() == N0VT.getSizeInBits()) + return DAG.getVSetCC(N->getDebugLoc(), VT, N0.getOperand(0), + N0.getOperand(1), + cast<CondCodeSDNode>(N0.getOperand(2))->get()); + // If the desired elements are smaller or larger than the source + // elements we can use a matching integer vector type and then + // truncate/sign extend + else { + EVT MatchingElementType = + EVT::getIntegerVT(*DAG.getContext(), + N0VT.getScalarType().getSizeInBits()); + EVT MatchingVectorType = + EVT::getVectorVT(*DAG.getContext(), MatchingElementType, + N0VT.getVectorNumElements()); + SDValue VsetCC = + DAG.getVSetCC(N->getDebugLoc(), MatchingVectorType, N0.getOperand(0), + N0.getOperand(1), + cast<CondCodeSDNode>(N0.getOperand(2))->get()); + return DAG.getSExtOrTrunc(VsetCC, N->getDebugLoc(), VT); + } + } + + // aext(setcc x,y,cc) -> select_cc x, y, 1, 0, cc SDValue SCC = SimplifySelectCC(N->getDebugLoc(), N0.getOperand(0), N0.getOperand(1), DAG.getConstant(1, VT), DAG.getConstant(0, VT), |