diff options
author | JF Bastien <jfb@google.com> | 2016-04-06 21:19:33 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | JF Bastien <jfb@google.com> | 2016-04-06 21:19:33 +0000 |
commit | 800f87a871282713fc5f41d00692b51b2ea6c207 (patch) | |
tree | b7b4323ac6fb5b8737b63ed9efe8af168551dbf7 /llvm/lib/Bitcode/Writer | |
parent | 31994e2eb670e03ec826002df0ae330db8e6c72c (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-800f87a871282713fc5f41d00692b51b2ea6c207.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-800f87a871282713fc5f41d00692b51b2ea6c207.zip |
NFC: make AtomicOrdering an enum class
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
llvm-svn: 265602
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Bitcode/Writer')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriter.cpp | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriter.cpp b/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriter.cpp index 99046d993a8..cbaaea8bbc6 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriter.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriter.cpp @@ -133,13 +133,13 @@ static unsigned GetEncodedRMWOperation(AtomicRMWInst::BinOp Op) { static unsigned GetEncodedOrdering(AtomicOrdering Ordering) { switch (Ordering) { - case NotAtomic: return bitc::ORDERING_NOTATOMIC; - case Unordered: return bitc::ORDERING_UNORDERED; - case Monotonic: return bitc::ORDERING_MONOTONIC; - case Acquire: return bitc::ORDERING_ACQUIRE; - case Release: return bitc::ORDERING_RELEASE; - case AcquireRelease: return bitc::ORDERING_ACQREL; - case SequentiallyConsistent: return bitc::ORDERING_SEQCST; + case AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic: return bitc::ORDERING_NOTATOMIC; + case AtomicOrdering::Unordered: return bitc::ORDERING_UNORDERED; + case AtomicOrdering::Monotonic: return bitc::ORDERING_MONOTONIC; + case AtomicOrdering::Acquire: return bitc::ORDERING_ACQUIRE; + case AtomicOrdering::Release: return bitc::ORDERING_RELEASE; + case AtomicOrdering::AcquireRelease: return bitc::ORDERING_ACQREL; + case AtomicOrdering::SequentiallyConsistent: return bitc::ORDERING_SEQCST; } llvm_unreachable("Invalid ordering"); } |