summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJingyue Wu <jingyue@google.com>2014-11-16 16:52:44 +0000
committerJingyue Wu <jingyue@google.com>2014-11-16 16:52:44 +0000
commit0fa125a77d4c960837c36c30ce8cecf8262f35e9 (patch)
tree5a90bc8a407513b1eff726c30773443b5c7c0e8c /llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
parentbf34f1d2b25f1c9a5e0904bdd8145e730268a498 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-0fa125a77d4c960837c36c30ce8cecf8262f35e9.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-0fa125a77d4c960837c36c30ce8cecf8262f35e9.zip
[DependenceAnalysis] Allow subscripts of different types
Summary: Several places in DependenceAnalysis assumes both SCEVs in a subscript pair share the same integer type. For instance, isKnownPredicate calls SE->getMinusSCEV(X, Y) which asserts X and Y share the same type. However, DependenceAnalysis fails to ensure this assumption when producing a subscript pair, causing tests such as NonCanonicalizedSubscript to crash. With this patch, DependenceAnalysis runs unifySubscriptType before producing any subscript pair, ensuring the assumption. Test Plan: Added NonCanonicalizedSubscript.ll on which DependenceAnalysis before the fix crashed because subscripts have different types. Reviewers: spop, sebpop, jingyue Reviewed By: jingyue Subscribers: eliben, meheff, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6289 llvm-svn: 222100
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp31
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
index 5ac3f38c0c5..092df5c15cd 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
@@ -781,6 +781,25 @@ void DependenceAnalysis::collectCommonLoops(const SCEV *Expression,
}
}
+void DependenceAnalysis::unifySubscriptType(Subscript *Pair) {
+ const SCEV *Src = Pair->Src;
+ const SCEV *Dst = Pair->Dst;
+ IntegerType *SrcTy = dyn_cast<IntegerType>(Src->getType());
+ IntegerType *DstTy = dyn_cast<IntegerType>(Dst->getType());
+ if (SrcTy == nullptr || DstTy == nullptr) {
+ assert(SrcTy == DstTy && "This function only unify integer types and "
+ "expect Src and Dst share the same type "
+ "otherwise.");
+ return;
+ }
+ if (SrcTy->getBitWidth() > DstTy->getBitWidth()) {
+ // Sign-extend Dst to typeof(Src) if typeof(Src) is wider than typeof(Dst).
+ Pair->Dst = SE->getSignExtendExpr(Dst, SrcTy);
+ } else if (SrcTy->getBitWidth() < DstTy->getBitWidth()) {
+ // Sign-extend Src to typeof(Dst) if typeof(Dst) is wider than typeof(Src).
+ Pair->Src = SE->getSignExtendExpr(Src, DstTy);
+ }
+}
// removeMatchingExtensions - Examines a subscript pair.
// If the source and destination are identically sign (or zero)
@@ -793,9 +812,11 @@ void DependenceAnalysis::removeMatchingExtensions(Subscript *Pair) {
(isa<SCEVSignExtendExpr>(Src) && isa<SCEVSignExtendExpr>(Dst))) {
const SCEVCastExpr *SrcCast = cast<SCEVCastExpr>(Src);
const SCEVCastExpr *DstCast = cast<SCEVCastExpr>(Dst);
- if (SrcCast->getType() == DstCast->getType()) {
- Pair->Src = SrcCast->getOperand();
- Pair->Dst = DstCast->getOperand();
+ const SCEV *SrcCastOp = SrcCast->getOperand();
+ const SCEV *DstCastOp = DstCast->getOperand();
+ if (SrcCastOp->getType() == DstCastOp->getType()) {
+ Pair->Src = SrcCastOp;
+ Pair->Dst = DstCastOp;
}
}
}
@@ -3178,7 +3199,7 @@ void DependenceAnalysis::updateDirection(Dependence::DVEntry &Level,
bool DependenceAnalysis::tryDelinearize(const SCEV *SrcSCEV,
const SCEV *DstSCEV,
SmallVectorImpl<Subscript> &Pair,
- const SCEV *ElementSize) const {
+ const SCEV *ElementSize) {
const SCEVUnknown *SrcBase =
dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(SE->getPointerBase(SrcSCEV));
const SCEVUnknown *DstBase =
@@ -3233,6 +3254,7 @@ bool DependenceAnalysis::tryDelinearize(const SCEV *SrcSCEV,
for (int i = 0; i < size; ++i) {
Pair[i].Src = SrcSubscripts[i];
Pair[i].Dst = DstSubscripts[i];
+ unifySubscriptType(&Pair[i]);
// FIXME: we should record the bounds SrcSizes[i] and DstSizes[i] that the
// delinearization has found, and add these constraints to the dependence
@@ -3341,6 +3363,7 @@ DependenceAnalysis::depends(Instruction *Src, Instruction *Dst,
++SrcIdx, ++DstIdx, ++P) {
Pair[P].Src = SE->getSCEV(*SrcIdx);
Pair[P].Dst = SE->getSCEV(*DstIdx);
+ unifySubscriptType(&Pair[P]);
}
}
else {
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud