diff options
author | Craig Topper <craig.topper@gmail.com> | 2017-04-26 16:39:58 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Craig Topper <craig.topper@gmail.com> | 2017-04-26 16:39:58 +0000 |
commit | b45eabcf82da2360b4243c820cd32b706f671c1a (patch) | |
tree | 472f7d59139627ccf935d11f6700cc226a3d4534 /llvm/lib/Analysis/DemandedBits.cpp | |
parent | eec01adde3ac789fe5e032ce34da3b2266830308 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-b45eabcf82da2360b4243c820cd32b706f671c1a.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-b45eabcf82da2360b4243c820cd32b706f671c1a.zip |
[ValueTracking] Introduce a KnownBits struct to wrap the two APInts for computeKnownBits
This patch introduces a new KnownBits struct that wraps the two APInt used by computeKnownBits. This allows us to treat them as more of a unit.
Initially I've just altered the signatures of computeKnownBits and InstCombine's simplifyDemandedBits to pass a KnownBits reference instead of two separate APInt references. I'll do similar to the SelectionDAG version of computeKnownBits/simplifyDemandedBits as a separate patch.
I've added a constructor that allows initializing both APInts to the same bit width with a starting value of 0. This reduces the repeated pattern of initializing both APInts. Once place default constructed the APInts so I added a default constructor for those cases.
Going forward I would like to add more methods that will work on the pairs. For example trunc, zext, and sext occur on both APInts together in several places. We should probably add a clear method that can be used to clear both pieces. Maybe a method to check for conflicting information. A method to return (Zero|One) so we don't write it out everywhere. Maybe a method for (Zero|One).isAllOnesValue() to determine if all bits are known. I'm sure there are many other methods we can come up with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32376
llvm-svn: 301432
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Analysis/DemandedBits.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Analysis/DemandedBits.cpp | 31 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/DemandedBits.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/DemandedBits.cpp index 151c0b0e6c9..285339deaaf 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/DemandedBits.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/DemandedBits.cpp @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ #include "llvm/IR/Operator.h" #include "llvm/Pass.h" #include "llvm/Support/Debug.h" +#include "llvm/Support/KnownBits.h" #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" using namespace llvm; @@ -72,8 +73,7 @@ static bool isAlwaysLive(Instruction *I) { void DemandedBits::determineLiveOperandBits( const Instruction *UserI, const Instruction *I, unsigned OperandNo, - const APInt &AOut, APInt &AB, APInt &KnownZero, APInt &KnownOne, - APInt &KnownZero2, APInt &KnownOne2) { + const APInt &AOut, APInt &AB, KnownBits &Known, KnownBits &Known2) { unsigned BitWidth = AB.getBitWidth(); // We're called once per operand, but for some instructions, we need to @@ -85,15 +85,13 @@ void DemandedBits::determineLiveOperandBits( auto ComputeKnownBits = [&](unsigned BitWidth, const Value *V1, const Value *V2) { const DataLayout &DL = I->getModule()->getDataLayout(); - KnownZero = APInt(BitWidth, 0); - KnownOne = APInt(BitWidth, 0); - computeKnownBits(const_cast<Value *>(V1), KnownZero, KnownOne, DL, 0, + Known = KnownBits(BitWidth); + computeKnownBits(const_cast<Value *>(V1), Known, DL, 0, &AC, UserI, &DT); if (V2) { - KnownZero2 = APInt(BitWidth, 0); - KnownOne2 = APInt(BitWidth, 0); - computeKnownBits(const_cast<Value *>(V2), KnownZero2, KnownOne2, DL, + Known2 = KnownBits(BitWidth); + computeKnownBits(const_cast<Value *>(V2), Known2, DL, 0, &AC, UserI, &DT); } }; @@ -120,7 +118,7 @@ void DemandedBits::determineLiveOperandBits( // known to be one. ComputeKnownBits(BitWidth, I, nullptr); AB = APInt::getHighBitsSet(BitWidth, - std::min(BitWidth, KnownOne.countLeadingZeros()+1)); + std::min(BitWidth, Known.One.countLeadingZeros()+1)); } break; case Intrinsic::cttz: @@ -130,7 +128,7 @@ void DemandedBits::determineLiveOperandBits( // known to be one. ComputeKnownBits(BitWidth, I, nullptr); AB = APInt::getLowBitsSet(BitWidth, - std::min(BitWidth, KnownOne.countTrailingZeros()+1)); + std::min(BitWidth, Known.One.countTrailingZeros()+1)); } break; } @@ -200,11 +198,11 @@ void DemandedBits::determineLiveOperandBits( // dead). if (OperandNo == 0) { ComputeKnownBits(BitWidth, I, UserI->getOperand(1)); - AB &= ~KnownZero2; + AB &= ~Known2.Zero; } else { if (!isa<Instruction>(UserI->getOperand(0))) ComputeKnownBits(BitWidth, UserI->getOperand(0), I); - AB &= ~(KnownZero & ~KnownZero2); + AB &= ~(Known.Zero & ~Known2.Zero); } break; case Instruction::Or: @@ -216,11 +214,11 @@ void DemandedBits::determineLiveOperandBits( // dead). if (OperandNo == 0) { ComputeKnownBits(BitWidth, I, UserI->getOperand(1)); - AB &= ~KnownOne2; + AB &= ~Known2.One; } else { if (!isa<Instruction>(UserI->getOperand(0))) ComputeKnownBits(BitWidth, UserI->getOperand(0), I); - AB &= ~(KnownOne & ~KnownOne2); + AB &= ~(Known.One & ~Known2.One); } break; case Instruction::Xor: @@ -318,7 +316,7 @@ void DemandedBits::performAnalysis() { if (!UserI->getType()->isIntegerTy()) Visited.insert(UserI); - APInt KnownZero, KnownOne, KnownZero2, KnownOne2; + KnownBits Known, Known2; // Compute the set of alive bits for each operand. These are anded into the // existing set, if any, and if that changes the set of alive bits, the // operand is added to the work-list. @@ -335,8 +333,7 @@ void DemandedBits::performAnalysis() { // Bits of each operand that are used to compute alive bits of the // output are alive, all others are dead. determineLiveOperandBits(UserI, I, OI.getOperandNo(), AOut, AB, - KnownZero, KnownOne, - KnownZero2, KnownOne2); + Known, Known2); } // If we've added to the set of alive bits (or the operand has not |