summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHal Finkel <hfinkel@anl.gov>2017-01-16 15:22:01 +0000
committerHal Finkel <hfinkel@anl.gov>2017-01-16 15:22:01 +0000
commitc29d5f1674469a887c0763362fc9f965a0ea1740 (patch)
treeff117afcd74a99ac54b9bcb56750708d32700856 /llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp
parentab8194def0e39797f9b1d47cf2d82ececa4bf508 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-c29d5f1674469a887c0763362fc9f965a0ea1740.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-c29d5f1674469a887c0763362fc9f965a0ea1740.zip
Fix use-after-free bug in AffectedValueCallbackVH::allUsesReplacedWith
When transferring affected values in the cache from an old value, identified by the value of the current callback, to the specified new value we might need to insert a new entry into the DenseMap which constitutes the cache. Doing so might delete the current callback object. Move the copying logic into a new function, a member of the assumption cache itself, so that we don't run into UB should the callback handle itself be removed mid-copy. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28749 llvm-svn: 292133
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp27
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp
index aa55d79b761..5851594700a 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
using namespace llvm;
using namespace llvm::PatternMatch;
-SmallVector<WeakVH, 1> &AssumptionCache::getAffectedValues(Value *V) {
+SmallVector<WeakVH, 1> &AssumptionCache::getOrInsertAffectedValues(Value *V) {
// Try using find_as first to avoid creating extra value handles just for the
// purpose of doing the lookup.
auto AVI = AffectedValues.find_as(V);
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ void AssumptionCache::updateAffectedValues(CallInst *CI) {
}
for (auto &AV : Affected) {
- auto &AVV = getAffectedValues(AV);
+ auto &AVV = getOrInsertAffectedValues(AV);
if (std::find(AVV.begin(), AVV.end(), CI) == AVV.end())
AVV.push_back(CI);
}
@@ -111,20 +111,27 @@ void AssumptionCache::AffectedValueCallbackVH::deleted() {
// 'this' now dangles!
}
+void AssumptionCache::copyAffectedValuesInCache(Value *OV, Value *NV) {
+ auto &NAVV = getOrInsertAffectedValues(NV);
+ auto AVI = AffectedValues.find(OV);
+ if (AVI == AffectedValues.end())
+ return;
+
+ for (auto &A : AVI->second)
+ if (std::find(NAVV.begin(), NAVV.end(), A) == NAVV.end())
+ NAVV.push_back(A);
+}
+
void AssumptionCache::AffectedValueCallbackVH::allUsesReplacedWith(Value *NV) {
if (!isa<Instruction>(NV) && !isa<Argument>(NV))
return;
// Any assumptions that affected this value now affect the new value.
- auto &NAVV = AC->getAffectedValues(NV);
- auto AVI = AC->AffectedValues.find(getValPtr());
- if (AVI == AC->AffectedValues.end())
- return;
-
- for (auto &A : AVI->second)
- if (std::find(NAVV.begin(), NAVV.end(), A) == NAVV.end())
- NAVV.push_back(A);
+ AC->copyAffectedValuesInCache(getValPtr(), NV);
+ // 'this' now might dangle! If the AffectedValues map was resized to add an
+ // entry for NV then this object might have been destroyed in favor of some
+ // copy in the grown map.
}
void AssumptionCache::scanFunction() {
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud