summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/docs/ProgrammersManual.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorArtyom Skrobov <Artyom.Skrobov@arm.com>2015-05-19 10:21:12 +0000
committerArtyom Skrobov <Artyom.Skrobov@arm.com>2015-05-19 10:21:12 +0000
commit6264115063137d655cb997fa1982c305dfa707a5 (patch)
treefc6d9149a7388e43fa7cb82e941e099737303e1e /llvm/docs/ProgrammersManual.rst
parent5e47696da2dc5a7b0aa7bb92183668c569182fe5 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-6264115063137d655cb997fa1982c305dfa707a5.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-6264115063137d655cb997fa1982c305dfa707a5.zip
Fix documentation for Set-Like Containers
llvm-svn: 237677
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/docs/ProgrammersManual.rst')
-rw-r--r--llvm/docs/ProgrammersManual.rst36
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/docs/ProgrammersManual.rst b/llvm/docs/ProgrammersManual.rst
index 6a4c22a692d..ceb39e18efd 100644
--- a/llvm/docs/ProgrammersManual.rst
+++ b/llvm/docs/ProgrammersManual.rst
@@ -1105,10 +1105,10 @@ If you have a set-like data structure that is usually small and whose elements
are reasonably small, a ``SmallSet<Type, N>`` is a good choice. This set has
space for N elements in place (thus, if the set is dynamically smaller than N,
no malloc traffic is required) and accesses them with a simple linear search.
-When the set grows beyond 'N' elements, it allocates a more expensive
+When the set grows beyond N elements, it allocates a more expensive
representation that guarantees efficient access (for most types, it falls back
-to std::set, but for pointers it uses something far better, :ref:`SmallPtrSet
-<dss_smallptrset>`.
+to :ref:`std::set <dss_set>`, but for pointers it uses something far better,
+:ref:`SmallPtrSet <dss_smallptrset>`.
The magic of this class is that it handles small sets extremely efficiently, but
gracefully handles extremely large sets without loss of efficiency. The
@@ -1120,16 +1120,31 @@ and erasing, but does not support iteration.
llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-SmallPtrSet has all the advantages of ``SmallSet`` (and a ``SmallSet`` of
+``SmallPtrSet`` has all the advantages of ``SmallSet`` (and a ``SmallSet`` of
pointers is transparently implemented with a ``SmallPtrSet``), but also supports
-iterators. If more than 'N' insertions are performed, a single quadratically
+iterators. If more than N insertions are performed, a single quadratically
probed hash table is allocated and grows as needed, providing extremely
efficient access (constant time insertion/deleting/queries with low constant
factors) and is very stingy with malloc traffic.
-Note that, unlike ``std::set``, the iterators of ``SmallPtrSet`` are invalidated
-whenever an insertion occurs. Also, the values visited by the iterators are not
-visited in sorted order.
+Note that, unlike :ref:`std::set <dss_set>`, the iterators of ``SmallPtrSet``
+are invalidated whenever an insertion occurs. Also, the values visited by the
+iterators are not visited in sorted order.
+
+.. _dss_stringset:
+
+llvm/ADT/StringSet.h
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+``StringSet`` is a thin wrapper around :ref:`StringMap\<char\> <dss_stringmap>`,
+and it allows efficient storage and retrieval of unique strings.
+
+Functionally analogous to ``SmallSet<StringRef>``, ``StringSet`` also suports
+iteration. (The iterator dereferences to a ``StringMapEntry<char>``, so you
+need to call ``i->getKey()`` to access the item of the StringSet.) On the
+other hand, ``StringSet`` doesn't support range-insertion and
+copy-construction, which :ref:`SmallSet <dss_smallset>` and :ref:`SmallPtrSet
+<dss_smallptrset>` do support.
.. _dss_denseset:
@@ -1297,8 +1312,9 @@ never use hash_set and unordered_set because they are generally very expensive
(each insertion requires a malloc) and very non-portable.
std::multiset is useful if you're not interested in elimination of duplicates,
-but has all the drawbacks of std::set. A sorted vector (where you don't delete
-duplicate entries) or some other approach is almost always better.
+but has all the drawbacks of :ref:`std::set <dss_set>`. A sorted vector
+(where you don't delete duplicate entries) or some other approach is almost
+always better.
.. _ds_map:
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud