diff options
author | Pavel Labath <labath@google.com> | 2016-07-26 08:11:57 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Pavel Labath <labath@google.com> | 2016-07-26 08:11:57 +0000 |
commit | f7e7fdd5cfebf4a8a30e4b4dce410a237f13a17c (patch) | |
tree | 292207befa0aff5545df77cd99b19009691ab0d2 /lldb/unittests/Core/DataExtractorTest.cpp | |
parent | 79011a660eda556f553fe52f090cb4156f12c1ab (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-f7e7fdd5cfebf4a8a30e4b4dce410a237f13a17c.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-f7e7fdd5cfebf4a8a30e4b4dce410a237f13a17c.zip |
Fix DataExtractor::PeekData for zero length peeks
Summary:
The function was returning the null pointer for peeks of size zero, which seems like a sensible
thing to do, but is actually pretty easy to get bitten by that if you are extracting a variable
length field which happens to be of zero length and then doing pointer arithmetic on that (which
SymbolFileDWARF does, and ended up crashing in case of empty DW_AT_location).
This changes the function to return a null pointer only when it gets queried for data which is
outside of the range of the extractor, which is more c++-y, as one can still do reasonable things
with pointers to data of size zero (think, end() iterators).
I also add a test and fix some signedness warnings in the existing data extractor tests.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22755
llvm-svn: 276734
Diffstat (limited to 'lldb/unittests/Core/DataExtractorTest.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lldb/unittests/Core/DataExtractorTest.cpp | 23 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/lldb/unittests/Core/DataExtractorTest.cpp b/lldb/unittests/Core/DataExtractorTest.cpp index f2288387505..22438e59bea 100644 --- a/lldb/unittests/Core/DataExtractorTest.cpp +++ b/lldb/unittests/Core/DataExtractorTest.cpp @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ using namespace lldb_private; TEST(DataExtractorTest, GetBitfield) { - char buffer[] = { 0x01, 0x23, 0x45, 0x67 }; + uint8_t buffer[] = { 0x01, 0x23, 0x45, 0x67 }; DataExtractor LE(buffer, sizeof(buffer), lldb::eByteOrderLittle, sizeof(void *)); DataExtractor BE(buffer, sizeof(buffer), lldb::eByteOrderBig, sizeof(void *)); @@ -33,7 +33,24 @@ TEST(DataExtractorTest, GetBitfield) ASSERT_EQ(buffer[1], BE.GetMaxU64Bitfield(&offset, sizeof(buffer), 8, 8)); offset = 0; - ASSERT_EQ(buffer[1], LE.GetMaxS64Bitfield(&offset, sizeof(buffer), 8, 8)); + ASSERT_EQ(int8_t(buffer[1]), LE.GetMaxS64Bitfield(&offset, sizeof(buffer), 8, 8)); offset = 0; - ASSERT_EQ(buffer[1], BE.GetMaxS64Bitfield(&offset, sizeof(buffer), 8, 8)); + ASSERT_EQ(int8_t(buffer[1]), BE.GetMaxS64Bitfield(&offset, sizeof(buffer), 8, 8)); +} + +TEST(DataExtractorTest, PeekData) +{ + uint8_t buffer[] = { 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04 }; + DataExtractor E(buffer, sizeof buffer, lldb::eByteOrderLittle, 4); + + EXPECT_EQ(buffer + 0, E.PeekData(0, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(buffer + 0, E.PeekData(0, 4)); + EXPECT_EQ(nullptr, E.PeekData(0, 5)); + + EXPECT_EQ(buffer + 2, E.PeekData(2, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(buffer + 2, E.PeekData(2, 2)); + EXPECT_EQ(nullptr, E.PeekData(2, 3)); + + EXPECT_EQ(buffer + 4, E.PeekData(4, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(nullptr, E.PeekData(4, 1)); } |