Roll back the changes I made in r193907 which created a new Frame

pure virtual base class and made StackFrame a subclass of that.  As
I started to build on top of that arrangement today, I found that it
wasn't working out like I intended.  Instead I'll try sticking with
the single StackFrame class -- there's too much code duplication to
make a more complicated class hierarchy sensible I think.

llvm-svn: 193983

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/UnwindMacOSXFrameBackchain.cpp b/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/UnwindMacOSXFrameBackchain.cpp
index fa76d6d650c..d011314b096 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/UnwindMacOSXFrameBackchain.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/UnwindMacOSXFrameBackchain.cpp
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ UnwindMacOSXFrameBackchain::DoGetFrameInfoAtIndex (uint32_t idx, addr_t& cfa, ad
 }
     
 lldb::RegisterContextSP
-UnwindMacOSXFrameBackchain::DoCreateRegisterContextForFrame (Frame *frame)
+UnwindMacOSXFrameBackchain::DoCreateRegisterContextForFrame (StackFrame *frame)
 {
     lldb::RegisterContextSP reg_ctx_sp;
     uint32_t concrete_idx = frame->GetConcreteFrameIndex ();
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ UnwindMacOSXFrameBackchain::GetStackFrameData_i386 (const ExecutionContext &exe_
 {
     m_cursors.clear();
     
-    Frame *first_frame = exe_ctx.GetFramePtr();
+    StackFrame *first_frame = exe_ctx.GetFramePtr();
 
     Process *process = exe_ctx.GetProcessPtr();
     if (process == NULL)
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ UnwindMacOSXFrameBackchain::GetStackFrameData_x86_64 (const ExecutionContext &ex
     if (process == NULL)
         return 0;
     
-    Frame *first_frame = exe_ctx.GetFramePtr();
+    StackFrame *first_frame = exe_ctx.GetFramePtr();
 
     std::pair<lldb::addr_t, lldb::addr_t> fp_pc_pair;