Reflow paragraphs in comments.

This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.

FYI, the script I used was:

import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
  header = ""
  text = ""
  comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
  special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
  for line in f:
      match = comment.match(line)
      if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
          # skip intentionally short comments.
          if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
              out.write(line)
              continue

          if text:
              text += " " + match.group(2)
          else:
              header = match.group(1)
              text = match.group(2)

          continue

      if text:
          filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
                                 break_long_words=False)
          for l in filled:
              out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
              text = ""

      out.write(line)

os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144

llvm-svn: 331197

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/FreeBSD/ProcessFreeBSD.cpp b/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/FreeBSD/ProcessFreeBSD.cpp
index ec33bf903d3..aa8464e9862 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/FreeBSD/ProcessFreeBSD.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/FreeBSD/ProcessFreeBSD.cpp
@@ -357,10 +357,10 @@ ProcessFreeBSD::GetFileSpec(const lldb_private::FileAction *file_action,
 
   if (file_action && file_action->GetAction() == FileAction::eFileActionOpen) {
     file_spec = file_action->GetFileSpec();
-    // By default the stdio paths passed in will be pseudo-terminal
-    // (/dev/pts). If so, convert to using a different default path
-    // instead to redirect I/O to the debugger console. This should
-    // also handle user overrides to /dev/null or a different file.
+    // By default the stdio paths passed in will be pseudo-terminal (/dev/pts).
+    // If so, convert to using a different default path instead to redirect I/O
+    // to the debugger console. This should also handle user overrides to
+    // /dev/null or a different file.
     if (!file_spec || file_spec == dbg_pts_file_spec)
       file_spec = default_file_spec;
   }
@@ -655,8 +655,8 @@ ProcessFreeBSD::GetSoftwareBreakpointTrapOpcode(BreakpointSite *bp_site) {
     break;
 
   case llvm::Triple::arm: {
-    // The ARM reference recommends the use of 0xe7fddefe and 0xdefe
-    // but the linux kernel does otherwise.
+    // The ARM reference recommends the use of 0xe7fddefe and 0xdefe but the
+    // linux kernel does otherwise.
     static const uint8_t g_arm_breakpoint_opcode[] = {0xf0, 0x01, 0xf0, 0xe7};
     static const uint8_t g_thumb_breakpoint_opcode[] = {0x01, 0xde};
 
@@ -744,8 +744,8 @@ Status ProcessFreeBSD::EnableWatchpoint(Watchpoint *wp, bool notify) {
         wp->SetEnabled(true, notify);
         return error;
       } else {
-        // Watchpoint enabling failed on at least one
-        // of the threads so roll back all of them
+        // Watchpoint enabling failed on at least one of the threads so roll
+        // back all of them
         DisableWatchpoint(wp, false);
         error.SetErrorString("Setting hardware watchpoint failed");
       }
@@ -812,8 +812,8 @@ Status ProcessFreeBSD::GetWatchpointSupportInfo(uint32_t &num) {
 
 Status ProcessFreeBSD::GetWatchpointSupportInfo(uint32_t &num, bool &after) {
   Status error = GetWatchpointSupportInfo(num);
-  // Watchpoints trigger and halt the inferior after
-  // the corresponding instruction has been executed.
+  // Watchpoints trigger and halt the inferior after the corresponding
+  // instruction has been executed.
   after = true;
   return error;
 }
@@ -1076,8 +1076,8 @@ Status ProcessFreeBSD::SetupSoftwareSingleStepping(lldb::tid_t tid) {
            "Emulation was successful but PC wasn't updated");
     next_pc = pc_it->second.GetAsUInt64();
   } else if (pc_it == baton.m_register_values.end()) {
-    // Emulate instruction failed and it haven't changed PC. Advance PC
-    // with the size of the current opcode because the emulation of all
+    // Emulate instruction failed and it haven't changed PC. Advance PC with
+    // the size of the current opcode because the emulation of all
     // PC modifying instruction should be successful. The failure most
     // likely caused by a not supported instruction which don't modify PC.
     next_pc =