diff options
| author | Adrian Prantl <aprantl@apple.com> | 2018-04-30 16:49:04 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Adrian Prantl <aprantl@apple.com> | 2018-04-30 16:49:04 +0000 |
| commit | 05097246f352eca76207c9ebb08656c88bdf751a (patch) | |
| tree | bfc4ec8250a939aaf4ade6fc6c528726183e5367 /lldb/source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang/ClangUserExpression.cpp | |
| parent | add59c052dd6768fd54431e6a3bf045e7f25cb59 (diff) | |
| download | bcm5719-llvm-05097246f352eca76207c9ebb08656c88bdf751a.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-05097246f352eca76207c9ebb08656c88bdf751a.zip | |
Reflow paragraphs in comments.
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
Diffstat (limited to 'lldb/source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang/ClangUserExpression.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | lldb/source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang/ClangUserExpression.cpp | 36 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/lldb/source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang/ClangUserExpression.cpp b/lldb/source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang/ClangUserExpression.cpp index 18fe8b49227..d6526c08f1b 100644 --- a/lldb/source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang/ClangUserExpression.cpp +++ b/lldb/source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang/ClangUserExpression.cpp @@ -195,12 +195,10 @@ void ClangUserExpression::ScanContext(ExecutionContext &exe_ctx, Status &err) { } else if (clang::FunctionDecl *function_decl = ClangASTContext::DeclContextGetAsFunctionDecl(decl_context)) { // We might also have a function that said in the debug information that it - // captured an - // object pointer. The best way to deal with getting to the ivars at - // present is by pretending - // that this is a method of a class in whatever runtime the debug info says - // the object pointer - // belongs to. Do that here. + // captured an object pointer. The best way to deal with getting to the + // ivars at present is by pretending that this is a method of a class in + // whatever runtime the debug info says the object pointer belongs to. Do + // that here. ClangASTMetadata *metadata = ClangASTContext::DeclContextGetMetaData(decl_context, function_decl); @@ -290,10 +288,10 @@ void ClangUserExpression::ScanContext(ExecutionContext &exe_ctx, Status &err) { } } -// This is a really nasty hack, meant to fix Objective-C expressions of the form -// (int)[myArray count]. Right now, because the type information for count is -// not available, [myArray count] returns id, which can't be directly cast to -// int without causing a clang error. +// This is a really nasty hack, meant to fix Objective-C expressions of the +// form (int)[myArray count]. Right now, because the type information for +// count is not available, [myArray count] returns id, which can't be directly +// cast to int without causing a clang error. static void ApplyObjcCastHack(std::string &expr) { #define OBJC_CAST_HACK_FROM "(int)[" #define OBJC_CAST_HACK_TO "(int)(long long)[" @@ -463,17 +461,15 @@ bool ClangUserExpression::Parse(DiagnosticManager &diagnostic_manager, exe_scope = exe_ctx.GetTargetPtr(); // We use a shared pointer here so we can use the original parser - if it - // succeeds - // or the rewrite parser we might make if it fails. But the parser_sp will - // never be empty. + // succeeds or the rewrite parser we might make if it fails. But the + // parser_sp will never be empty. ClangExpressionParser parser(exe_scope, *this, generate_debug_info); unsigned num_errors = parser.Parse(diagnostic_manager); // Check here for FixItHints. If there are any try to apply the fixits and - // set the fixed text in m_fixed_text - // before returning an error. + // set the fixed text in m_fixed_text before returning an error. if (num_errors) { if (diagnostic_manager.HasFixIts()) { if (parser.RewriteExpression(diagnostic_manager)) { @@ -495,8 +491,8 @@ bool ClangUserExpression::Parse(DiagnosticManager &diagnostic_manager, } ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// - // Prepare the output of the parser for execution, evaluating it statically if - // possible + // Prepare the output of the parser for execution, evaluating it statically + // if possible // { @@ -539,9 +535,9 @@ bool ClangUserExpression::Parse(DiagnosticManager &diagnostic_manager, register_execution_unit = true; } - // If there is more than one external function in the execution - // unit, it needs to keep living even if it's not top level, because - // the result could refer to that function. + // If there is more than one external function in the execution unit, it + // needs to keep living even if it's not top level, because the result + // could refer to that function. if (m_execution_unit_sp->GetJittedFunctions().size() > 1) { register_execution_unit = true; |

