remove use of Mutex in favour of std::{,recursive_}mutex

This is a pretty straightforward first pass over removing a number of uses of
Mutex in favor of std::mutex or std::recursive_mutex. The problem is that there
are interfaces which take Mutex::Locker & to lock internal locks. This patch
cleans up most of the easy cases. The only non-trivial change is in
CommandObjectTarget.cpp where a Mutex::Locker was split into two.

llvm-svn: 269877

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/lldb/source/Plugins/Disassembler/llvm/DisassemblerLLVMC.h b/lldb/source/Plugins/Disassembler/llvm/DisassemblerLLVMC.h
index 6359146d81d..e8f09a4d3ab 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Plugins/Disassembler/llvm/DisassemblerLLVMC.h
+++ b/lldb/source/Plugins/Disassembler/llvm/DisassemblerLLVMC.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 // C Includes
 // C++ Includes
 #include <memory>
+#include <mutex>
 #include <string>
 
 // Other libraries and framework includes
@@ -22,7 +23,6 @@
 #include "lldb/Core/Address.h"
 #include "lldb/Core/Disassembler.h"
 #include "lldb/Core/PluginManager.h"
-#include "lldb/Host/Mutex.h"
 
 // Opaque references to C++ Objects in LLVM's MC.
 namespace llvm
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ protected:
     void Lock(InstructionLLVMC *inst,
               const lldb_private::ExecutionContext *exe_ctx)
     {
-        m_mutex.Lock();
+        m_mutex.lock();
         m_inst = inst;
         m_exe_ctx = exe_ctx;
     }
@@ -156,12 +156,12 @@ protected:
     {
         m_inst = NULL;
         m_exe_ctx = NULL;
-        m_mutex.Unlock();
+        m_mutex.unlock();
     }
 
     const lldb_private::ExecutionContext *m_exe_ctx;
     InstructionLLVMC *m_inst;
-    lldb_private::Mutex m_mutex;
+    std::mutex m_mutex;
     bool m_data_from_file;
 
     std::unique_ptr<LLVMCDisassembler> m_disasm_ap;