Don't expose the pthread_mutex_t underlying the Mutex & Mutex::Locker classes.

No one was using it and Locker(pthread_mutex_t *) immediately asserts for 
pthread_mutex_t's that don't come from a Mutex anyway.  Rather than try to make
that work, we should maintain the Mutex abstraction and not pass around the
platform implementation...

Make Mutex::Locker::Lock take a Mutex & or a Mutex *, and remove the constructor
taking a pthread_mutex_t *.  You no longer need to call Mutex::GetMutex to pass
your mutex to a Locker (you can't in fact, since I made it private.)

llvm-svn: 156221

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/lldb/source/Host/common/Condition.cpp b/lldb/source/Host/common/Condition.cpp
index 535afcb0439..daa729cadca 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Host/common/Condition.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Host/common/Condition.cpp
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ Condition::Signal ()
 // The current thread re-acquires the lock on "mutex".
 //----------------------------------------------------------------------
 int
-Condition::Wait (pthread_mutex_t *mutex, const TimeValue *abstime, bool *timed_out)
+Condition::Wait (Mutex &mutex, const TimeValue *abstime, bool *timed_out)
 {
     int err = 0;
     do
@@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ Condition::Wait (pthread_mutex_t *mutex, const TimeValue *abstime, bool *timed_o
         if (abstime && abstime->IsValid())
         {
             struct timespec abstime_ts = abstime->GetAsTimeSpec();
-            err = ::pthread_cond_timedwait (&m_condition, mutex, &abstime_ts);
+            err = ::pthread_cond_timedwait (&m_condition, mutex.GetMutex(), &abstime_ts);
         }
         else
-            err = ::pthread_cond_wait (&m_condition, mutex);
+            err = ::pthread_cond_wait (&m_condition, mutex.GetMutex());
     } while (err == EINTR);
 
     if (timed_out != NULL)