Don't expose the pthread_mutex_t underlying the Mutex & Mutex::Locker classes.

No one was using it and Locker(pthread_mutex_t *) immediately asserts for 
pthread_mutex_t's that don't come from a Mutex anyway.  Rather than try to make
that work, we should maintain the Mutex abstraction and not pass around the
platform implementation...

Make Mutex::Locker::Lock take a Mutex & or a Mutex *, and remove the constructor
taking a pthread_mutex_t *.  You no longer need to call Mutex::GetMutex to pass
your mutex to a Locker (you can't in fact, since I made it private.)

llvm-svn: 156221

2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/lldb/source/Breakpoint/BreakpointList.cpp b/lldb/source/Breakpoint/BreakpointList.cpp
index 9ec6d8daec8..e1aa2dbcb1e 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Breakpoint/BreakpointList.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Breakpoint/BreakpointList.cpp
@@ -223,5 +223,5 @@ BreakpointList::ClearAllBreakpointSites ()
 void
 BreakpointList::GetListMutex (Mutex::Locker &locker)
 {
-    return locker.Lock (m_mutex.GetMutex());
+    return locker.Lock (m_mutex);
 }
diff --git a/lldb/source/Breakpoint/WatchpointList.cpp b/lldb/source/Breakpoint/WatchpointList.cpp
index f95265993ae..bfd0b4cdc5d 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Breakpoint/WatchpointList.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Breakpoint/WatchpointList.cpp
@@ -273,5 +273,5 @@ WatchpointList::RemoveAll ()
 void
 WatchpointList::GetListMutex (Mutex::Locker &locker)
 {
-    return locker.Lock (m_mutex.GetMutex());
+    return locker.Lock (m_mutex);
 }