[InstCombine] dropRedundantMaskingOfLeftShiftInput(): pat. a/b with mask (PR42563)

Summary:
And this is **finally** the interesting part of that fold!

If we have a pattern `(x & (~(-1 << maskNbits))) << shiftNbits`,
we already know (have a fold) that will drop the `& (~(-1 << maskNbits))`
mask iff `(maskNbits+shiftNbits) u>= bitwidth(x)`.
But that is actually ignorant, there's more general fold here:

In this pattern, `(maskNbits+shiftNbits)` actually correlates
with the number of low bits that will remain in the final value.
So even if `(maskNbits+shiftNbits) u< bitwidth(x)`, we can still
fold, we will just need to apply a **constant** mask afterwards:
```
Name: a, normal+mask
  %onebit = shl i32 -1, C1
  %mask = xor i32 %onebit, -1
  %masked = and i32 %mask, %x
  %r = shl i32 %masked, C2
=>
  %n0 = shl i32 %x, C2
  %n1 = add i32 C1, C2
  %n2 = zext i32 %n1 to i64
  %n3 = shl i64 -1, %n2
  %n4 = xor i64 %n3, -1
  %n5 = trunc i64 %n4 to i32
  %r = and i32 %n0, %n5
```
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/F5R

Naturally, old `%masked` will have to be one-use.
Similar fold exists for patterns c,d,e, will post patch later.

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563

Reviewers: spatel, nikic, xbolva00

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67677

llvm-svn: 372629

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions