summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/python_api/process/main.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVedant Kumar <vsk@apple.com>2018-10-24 22:15:41 +0000
committerVedant Kumar <vsk@apple.com>2018-10-24 22:15:41 +0000
commitc29900687983824ca66fbd83491390873523339e (patch)
treef84721b45033a99a5e70d7186d53471788b318ae /lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/python_api/process/main.cpp
parent444363e931d427719ddaa91819a9b133b8ac70e8 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-c29900687983824ca66fbd83491390873523339e.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-c29900687983824ca66fbd83491390873523339e.zip
[HotColdSplitting] Identify larger cold regions using domtree queries
The current splitting algorithm works in three stages: 1) Identify cold blocks, then 2) Use forward/backward propagation to mark hot blocks, then 3) Grow a SESE region of blocks *outside* of the set of hot blocks and start outlining. While testing this pass on Apple internal frameworks I noticed that some kinds of control flow (e.g. loops) are never outlined, even though they unconditionally lead to / follow cold blocks. I noticed two other issues related to how cold regions are identified: - An inconsistency can arise in the internal state of the hotness propagation stage, as a block may end up in both the ColdBlocks set and the HotBlocks set. Further inconsistencies can arise as these sets do not match what's in ProfileSummaryInfo. - It isn't necessary to limit outlining to single-exit regions. This patch teaches the splitting algorithm to identify maximal cold regions and outline them. A maximal cold region is defined as the set of blocks post-dominated by a cold sink block, or dominated by that sink block. This approach can successfully outline loops in the cold path. As a side benefit, it maintains less internal state than the current approach. Due to a limitation in CodeExtractor, blocks within the maximal cold region which aren't dominated by a single entry point (a so-called "max ancestor") are filtered out. Results: - X86 (LNT + -Os + externals): 134KB of TEXT were outlined compared to 47KB pre-patch, or a ~3x improvement. Did not see a performance impact across two runs. - AArch64 (LNT + -Os + externals + Apple-internal benchmarks): 149KB of TEXT were outlined. Ditto re: performance impact. - Outlining results improve marginally in the internal frameworks I tested. Follow-ups: - Outline more than once per function, outline large single basic blocks, & try to remove unconditional branches in outlined functions. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53627 llvm-svn: 345209
Diffstat (limited to 'lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/python_api/process/main.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud