Remove expectedFailureWindows decorator.

expectedFailureWindows is equivalent to using the general
expectedFailureAll decorator with oslist="windows".  Additionally,
by moving towards these common decorators we can solve the issue
of having to support decorators that can be called with or without
arguments.  Once all decorators are always called with arguments,
and this is enforced by design (because you can't specify the condition
you're decorating for without passing an argument) the implementation
of the decorators can become much simpler

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16936

llvm-svn: 260134

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lang/cpp/static_members/TestCPPStaticMembers.py b/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lang/cpp/static_members/TestCPPStaticMembers.py
index 8cc9386a995..dd220d90527 100644
--- a/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lang/cpp/static_members/TestCPPStaticMembers.py
+++ b/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lang/cpp/static_members/TestCPPStaticMembers.py
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ class CPPStaticMembersTestCase(TestBase):
     mydir = TestBase.compute_mydir(__file__)
     
     @unittest2.expectedFailure # llvm.org/pr15401
-    @expectedFailureWindows("llvm.org/pr21765")
+    @expectedFailureAll(oslist=["windows"], bugnumber="llvm.org/pr21765")
     def test_with_run_command(self):
         """Test that member variables have the correct layout, scope and qualifiers when stopped inside and outside C++ methods"""
         self.build()