summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.object/optional.object.observe/dereference.pass.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Fiselier <eric@efcs.ca>2016-10-12 07:46:20 +0000
committerEric Fiselier <eric@efcs.ca>2016-10-12 07:46:20 +0000
commita9e659619f592c49b352af16253ec0b79c207956 (patch)
treeafba7c02efb5a36d4fb797262d8b0db50da64c49 /libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.object/optional.object.observe/dereference.pass.cpp
parent90d990e034f05f4d9e0354f54205fd3b471f6507 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-a9e659619f592c49b352af16253ec0b79c207956.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-a9e659619f592c49b352af16253ec0b79c207956.zip
Implement N4606 optional
Summary: Adapt implementation of Library Fundamentals TS optional into an implementation of N4606 optional. - Update relational operators per http://wg21.link/P0307 - Update to requirements of http://wg21.link/P0032 - Extension: Implement trivial copy/move construction/assignment for `optional<T>` when `T` is trivially copyable. Audit P/Rs for optional LWG issues: - 2756 "C++ WP optional<T> should 'forward' T's implicit conversions" Implemented, which also resolves 2753 "Optional's constructors and assignments need constraints" (modulo my refusal to explicitly delete the move operations, which is a design error that I'm working on correcting in the 2756 P/R). - 2736 "nullopt_t insufficiently constrained" Already conforming. I've added a test ensuring that `nullopt_t` is not copy-initializable from an empty braced-init-list, which I believe is the root intent of the issue, to avoid regression. - 2740 "constexpr optional<T>::operator->" Already conforming. - 2746 "Inconsistency between requirements for emplace between optional and variant" No P/R, but note that the author's '"suggested resolution" is already implemented. - 2748 "swappable traits for optionals" Already conforming. - 2753 "Optional's constructors and assignments need constraints" Implemented. Most of the work for this patch was done by Casey Carter @ Microsoft. Thank you Casey! Reviewers: mclow.lists, CaseyCarter, EricWF Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22741 llvm-svn: 283980
Diffstat (limited to 'libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.object/optional.object.observe/dereference.pass.cpp')
-rw-r--r--libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.object/optional.object.observe/dereference.pass.cpp73
1 files changed, 73 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.object/optional.object.observe/dereference.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.object/optional.object.observe/dereference.pass.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4087cfdf104
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.object/optional.object.observe/dereference.pass.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
+// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+// UNSUPPORTED: c++98, c++03, c++11, c++14
+// <optional>
+
+// constexpr T& optional<T>::operator*() &;
+
+#ifdef _LIBCPP_DEBUG
+#define _LIBCPP_ASSERT(x, m) ((x) ? (void)0 : std::exit(0))
+#endif
+
+#include <optional>
+#include <type_traits>
+#include <cassert>
+
+#include "test_macros.h"
+
+using std::optional;
+
+struct X
+{
+ constexpr int test() const& {return 3;}
+ int test() & {return 4;}
+ constexpr int test() const&& {return 5;}
+ int test() && {return 6;}
+};
+
+struct Y
+{
+ constexpr int test() {return 7;}
+};
+
+constexpr int
+test()
+{
+ optional<Y> opt{Y{}};
+ return (*opt).test();
+}
+
+int main()
+{
+ {
+ optional<X> opt; ((void)opt);
+ ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(decltype(*opt), X&);
+ // ASSERT_NOT_NOEXCEPT(*opt);
+ // FIXME: This assertion fails with GCC because it can see that
+ // (A) operator*() is constexpr, and
+ // (B) there is no path through the function that throws.
+ // It's arguable if this is the correct behavior for the noexcept
+ // operator.
+ // Regardless this function should still be noexcept(false) because
+ // it has a narrow contract.
+ }
+ {
+ optional<X> opt(X{});
+ assert((*opt).test() == 4);
+ }
+ static_assert(test() == 7, "");
+#ifdef _LIBCPP_DEBUG
+ {
+ optional<X> opt;
+ assert((*opt).test() == 3);
+ assert(false);
+ }
+#endif // _LIBCPP_DEBUG
+}
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud