[libcxx] Improve tests to use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive

Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format:
 #if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X
   // Do test.
 #else
   // Empty test.
 #endif
We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on
earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes
for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit
directives on the same tests.

Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists

Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730

llvm-svn: 271108

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/function.objects/bitwise.operations/bit_not.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/function.objects/bitwise.operations/bit_not.pass.cpp
index 48800a366a8..d5788986dd2 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/function.objects/bitwise.operations/bit_not.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/function.objects/bitwise.operations/bit_not.pass.cpp
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 //
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
+// UNSUPPORTED: c++98, c++03, c++11
 // <functional>
 
 // bit_not
@@ -17,7 +18,6 @@
 
 int main()
 {
-#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 11
     typedef std::bit_not<int> F;
     const F f = F();
     static_assert((std::is_same<F::argument_type, int>::value), "" );
@@ -43,5 +43,4 @@ int main()
 
     constexpr int bar = std::bit_not<> () (0xEA95) & 0xFFFF;
     static_assert ( bar == 0x156A, "" );
-#endif
 }