diff options
author | Louis Dionne <ldionne@apple.com> | 2018-11-01 21:24:32 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Louis Dionne <ldionne@apple.com> | 2018-11-01 21:24:32 +0000 |
commit | e0a724ef9c897b29be40c8b284ad4485d84effff (patch) | |
tree | bd5cf8f90ae9920a7fc7b27c0edd588a72982b81 /libcxx/benchmarks/algorithms.bench.cpp | |
parent | df19e57a1c39feb0c89170ffdb3a335f78d4bccf (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-e0a724ef9c897b29be40c8b284ad4485d84effff.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-e0a724ef9c897b29be40c8b284ad4485d84effff.zip |
Revert "Bug 39129: Speeding up partition_point/lower_bound/upper_bound/ by using unsigned division by 2 when possible."
This reverts r345525. I'm reverting because that patch apparently caused
a regression on certain platforms (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D53994).
Since we don't fully understand the reasons for the regression, I'm
reverting until we can provide a fix we understand.
llvm-svn: 345893
Diffstat (limited to 'libcxx/benchmarks/algorithms.bench.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | libcxx/benchmarks/algorithms.bench.cpp | 64 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 64 deletions
diff --git a/libcxx/benchmarks/algorithms.bench.cpp b/libcxx/benchmarks/algorithms.bench.cpp index ab0e81b0cac..86315390e0d 100644 --- a/libcxx/benchmarks/algorithms.bench.cpp +++ b/libcxx/benchmarks/algorithms.bench.cpp @@ -58,69 +58,5 @@ BENCHMARK_CAPTURE(BM_Sort, sorted_descending_strings, BENCHMARK_CAPTURE(BM_Sort, single_element_strings, getDuplicateStringInputs)->Arg(TestNumInputs); -template <typename GenInputs, typename Alg> -void do_binary_search_benchmark(benchmark::State& st, GenInputs gen, Alg alg) -{ - using ValueType = typename decltype(gen(0))::value_type; - auto in = gen(st.range(0)); - std::sort(in.begin(), in.end()); - - const auto every_10_percentile = [&]() -> std::vector<ValueType*> { - size_t step = in.size() / 10; - - if (step == 0) { - st.SkipWithError("Input doesn't contain enough elements"); - return {}; - } - - std::vector<ValueType*> res; - for (size_t i = 0; i < in.size(); i += step) - res.push_back(&in[i]); - - return res; - }(); - - for (auto _ : st) - { - for (auto* test : every_10_percentile) - benchmark::DoNotOptimize(alg(in.begin(), in.end(), *test)); - } -} - -template <typename GenInputs> -void BM_LowerBound(benchmark::State& st, GenInputs gen) -{ - do_binary_search_benchmark(st, gen, [](auto f, auto l, const auto& v) { - return std::lower_bound(f, l, v); - }); -} - -BENCHMARK_CAPTURE(BM_LowerBound, random_int32, getRandomIntegerInputs<int32_t>) - ->Arg(TestNumInputs) // Small int32_t vector - ->Arg(TestNumInputs * TestNumInputs); // Big int32_t vector - -BENCHMARK_CAPTURE(BM_LowerBound, random_int64, getRandomIntegerInputs<int64_t>) - ->Arg(TestNumInputs); // Small int64_t vector. Should also represent pointers. - -BENCHMARK_CAPTURE(BM_LowerBound, random_strings, getRandomStringInputs) - ->Arg(TestNumInputs); // Small string vector. What happens if the comparison is not very cheap. - -template <typename GenInputs> -void BM_EqualRange(benchmark::State& st, GenInputs gen) -{ - do_binary_search_benchmark(st, gen, [](auto f, auto l, const auto& v) { - return std::equal_range(f, l, v); - }); -} - -BENCHMARK_CAPTURE(BM_EqualRange, random_int32, getRandomIntegerInputs<int32_t>) - ->Arg(TestNumInputs) // Small int32_t vector - ->Arg(TestNumInputs * TestNumInputs); // Big int32_t vector - -BENCHMARK_CAPTURE(BM_EqualRange, random_int64, getRandomIntegerInputs<int64_t>) - ->Arg(TestNumInputs); // Small int64_t vector. Should also represent pointers. - -BENCHMARK_CAPTURE(BM_EqualRange, random_strings, getRandomStringInputs) - ->Arg(TestNumInputs); // Small string vector. What happens if the comparison is not very cheap. BENCHMARK_MAIN(); |