diff options
| author | Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> | 2013-04-08 18:56:15 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> | 2013-04-08 18:56:15 +0000 |
| commit | 1dfc27d9c1b86fdd0a6146ac3a006b3df75fb6ce (patch) | |
| tree | ef789c9ac43c44bbb810ff11881c0e038e8b54aa /clang/www | |
| parent | 8a58e4a649288ebce40696df77bb3f4797c43d03 (diff) | |
| download | bcm5719-llvm-1dfc27d9c1b86fdd0a6146ac3a006b3df75fb6ce.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-1dfc27d9c1b86fdd0a6146ac3a006b3df75fb6ce.zip | |
In the comparison, both clang and GCC are popular and widely adopted. This is no longer a win of GCC.
This whole doc should really be looked at.
llvm-svn: 179040
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/www')
| -rw-r--r-- | clang/www/comparison.html | 1 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/clang/www/comparison.html b/clang/www/comparison.html index e8b14923b68..afc321e0619 100644 --- a/clang/www/comparison.html +++ b/clang/www/comparison.html @@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ <li>GCC supports languages that clang does not aim to, such as Java, Ada, FORTRAN, etc.</li> <li>GCC supports more targets than LLVM.</li> - <li>GCC is popular and widely adopted.</li> </ul> <p>Pro's of clang vs GCC:</p> |
