When looking for operator() to type-check a call to an object of class

type, use full qualified name lookup rather than the poking the
declaration context directly. This makes sure that we see operator()'s
in superclasses. Also, move the complete-type check before this name
lookup.

llvm-svn: 88842

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-operator.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-operator.cpp
index 750038d4ab5..7762667d1ab 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-operator.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-operator.cpp
@@ -164,7 +164,11 @@ struct Callable2 {
   double& operator()(...) const;
 };
 
-void test_callable(Callable c, Callable2 c2, const Callable2& c2c) {
+struct DerivesCallable : public Callable {
+};
+
+void test_callable(Callable c, Callable2 c2, const Callable2& c2c,
+                   DerivesCallable dc) {
   int &ir = c(1);
   float &fr = c(1, 3.14159, 17, 42);
 
@@ -175,6 +179,9 @@ void test_callable(Callable c, Callable2 c2, const Callable2& c2c) {
   int &ir2 = c2();
   int &ir3 = c2(1);
   double &fr2 = c2c();
+  
+  int &ir4 = dc(17);
+  double &fr3 = dc(3.14159f);
 }
 
 typedef float FLOAT;