PR11410: Extend diagnostic to cover all cases of aggregate initialization, not

just the extremely specific case of a trailing array element that couldn't be
initialized because the default constructor for the element type is deleted.

Also reword the diagnostic to better match our other context diagnostics and to
prepare for the implementation of core issue 1070.

llvm-svn: 210083

3 files changed, 31 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-constructor.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-constructor.cpp
index 47afead305c..2dea40c0bd4 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-constructor.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-constructor.cpp
@@ -378,11 +378,28 @@ namespace PR19729 {
 
 namespace PR11410 {
   struct A {
-    A() = delete; // expected-note {{deleted here}}
+    A() = delete; // expected-note 2{{deleted here}}
     A(int);
   };
 
   A a[3] = {
     {1}, {2}
-  }; // expected-error {{call to deleted constructor}} expected-note {{implicitly default constructed}}
+  }; // expected-error {{call to deleted constructor}} \
+        expected-note {{in implicit initialization of array element 2 with omitted initializer}}
+
+  struct B {
+    A a; // expected-note {{in implicit initialization of field 'a'}}
+  } b = { // expected-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
+  };
+
+  struct C {
+    C(int = 0); // expected-note 2{{candidate}}
+    C(float = 0); // expected-note 2{{candidate}}
+  };
+  C c[3] = {
+    0, 1
+  }; // expected-error {{ambiguous}} expected-note {{in implicit initialization of array element 2}}
+  C c2[3] = {
+    [0] = 1, [2] = 3
+  }; // expected-error {{ambiguous}} expected-note {{in implicit initialization of array element 1}}
 }
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/dcl_init_aggr.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/dcl_init_aggr.cpp
index 8c5e654fca2..432c1164661 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/dcl_init_aggr.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/dcl_init_aggr.cpp
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct NoDefaultConstructor { // expected-note 3 {{candidate constructor (the im
 };
 struct TooFewError { // expected-error{{implicit default constructor for}}
   int a;
-  NoDefaultConstructor nodef; // expected-note{{member is declared here}}
+  NoDefaultConstructor nodef; // expected-note{{member is declared here}} expected-note 2{{in implicit initialization of field 'nodef'}}
 };
 TooFewError too_few_okay = { 1, 1 };
 TooFewError too_few_error = { 1 }; // expected-error{{no matching constructor}}
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ TooFewError too_few_error = { 1 }; // expected-error{{no matching constructor}}
 TooFewError too_few_okay2[2] = { 1, 1 }; // expected-note{{implicit default constructor for 'TooFewError' first required here}}
 TooFewError too_few_error2[2] = { 1 }; // expected-error{{no matching constructor}}
 
-NoDefaultConstructor too_few_error3[3] = { }; // expected-error {{no matching constructor}}
+NoDefaultConstructor too_few_error3[3] = { }; // expected-error {{no matching constructor}} expected-note {{implicit initialization of array element 0}}
 
 // C++ [dcl.init.aggr]p8
 struct Empty { };
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete-cxx0x.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete-cxx0x.cpp
index c404faba2a2..899cb4cda87 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete-cxx0x.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete-cxx0x.cpp
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 
 void ugly_news(int *ip) {
   // These are ill-formed according to one reading of C++98, and at the least
-  // have undefined behavior. But they're well-formed, and defined to throw
-  // std::bad_array_new_length, in C++11.
+  // have undefined behavior.
+  // FIXME: They're ill-formed in C++11.
   (void)new int[-1]; // expected-warning {{array size is negative}}
   (void)new int[2000000000]; // expected-warning {{array is too large}}
 }
@@ -22,5 +22,12 @@ struct T { // expected-note 2 {{not viable}}
 void fn() {
   (void) new int[2] {1, 2};
   (void) new S[2] {1, 2};
-  (void) new T[2] {1, 2}; // expected-error {{no matching constructor}}
+  // C++11 [expr.new]p19:
+  //   If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class
+  //   type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function,
+  //   the deallocation function (12.5), and the constructor (12.1).
+  //
+  // Note that this happens even if the array bound is constant and the
+  // initializer initializes every array element.
+  (void) new T[2] {1, 2}; // expected-error {{no matching constructor}} expected-note {{in implicit initialization of array element 2}}
 }