[analyzer] Implement path notes for temporary destructors.

Temporary destructors fire at the end of the full-expression. It is reasonable
to attach the path note for entering/leaving the temporary destructor to its
CXXBindTemporaryExpr. This would not affect lifetime-extended temporaries with
their automatic destructors which aren't temporary destructors.

The path note may be confusing in the case of destructors after elidable copy
constructors.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43144

llvm-svn: 325284

1 files changed, 64 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/Analysis/inlining/temp-dtors-path-notes.cpp b/clang/test/Analysis/inlining/temp-dtors-path-notes.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..dfa08f3cc4f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/Analysis/inlining/temp-dtors-path-notes.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker core -analyzer-config cfg-temporary-dtors=true -analyzer-output=text -verify %s
+
+namespace test_simple_temporary {
+class C {
+  int x;
+
+public:
+  C(int x): x(x) {} // expected-note{{The value 0 is assigned to field 'x'}}
+  ~C() { x = 1 / x; } // expected-warning{{Division by zero}}
+                      // expected-note@-1{{Division by zero}}
+};
+
+void test() {
+  C(0); // expected-note   {{Passing the value 0 via 1st parameter 'x'}}
+        // expected-note@-1{{Calling constructor for 'C'}}
+        // expected-note@-2{{Returning from constructor for 'C'}}
+        // expected-note@-3{{Calling '~C'}}
+}
+} // end namespace test_simple_temporary
+
+namespace test_lifetime_extended_temporary {
+class C {
+  int x;
+
+public:
+  C(int x): x(x) {} // expected-note{{The value 0 is assigned to field 'x'}}
+  void nop() const {}
+  ~C() { x = 1 / x; } // expected-warning{{Division by zero}}
+                      // expected-note@-1{{Division by zero}}
+};
+
+void test(int coin) {
+  // We'd divide by zero in the temporary destructor that goes after the
+  // elidable copy-constructor from C(0) to the lifetime-extended temporary.
+  // So in fact this example has nothing to do with lifetime extension.
+  // Actually, it would probably be better to elide the constructor, and
+  // put the note for the destructor call at the closing brace after nop.
+  const C &c = coin ? C(1) : C(0); // expected-note   {{Assuming 'coin' is 0}}
+                                   // expected-note@-1{{'?' condition is false}}
+                                   // expected-note@-2{{Passing the value 0 via 1st parameter 'x'}}
+                                   // expected-note@-3{{Calling constructor for 'C'}}
+                                   // expected-note@-4{{Returning from constructor for 'C'}}
+                                   // expected-note@-5{{Calling '~C'}}
+  c.nop();
+}
+} // end namespace test_lifetime_extended_temporary
+
+namespace test_bug_after_dtor {
+int glob;
+
+class C {
+public:
+  C() { glob += 1; }
+  ~C() { glob -= 2; } // expected-note{{The value 0 is assigned to 'glob'}}
+};
+
+void test() {
+  glob = 1;
+  C(); // expected-note   {{Calling '~C'}}
+       // expected-note@-1{{Returning from '~C'}}
+  glob = 1 / glob; // expected-warning{{Division by zero}}
+                   // expected-note@-1{{Division by zero}}
+}
+} // end namespace test_bug_after_dtor