diff options
author | Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> | 2019-05-09 03:31:27 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> | 2019-05-09 03:31:27 +0000 |
commit | b23c5e8c3df850177449268c5ca7dbf986157525 (patch) | |
tree | 676dabf23d28ebd62d0f453558f8874ea7eafe29 /clang/test/SemaTemplate/rdar9173693.cpp | |
parent | a438a898b02a93a0179be1dd5ed67fb5b01dcf6b (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-b23c5e8c3df850177449268c5ca7dbf986157525.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-b23c5e8c3df850177449268c5ca7dbf986157525.zip |
[c++20] Implement P0846R0: allow (ADL-only) calls to template-ids whose
template name is not visible to unqualified lookup.
In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to
diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures
the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the
template name finds nothing.
Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a
placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find
any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to
disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id.
Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its
point of use.
The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality
overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to
resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In
fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for
an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but
no function templates) is enabled in all language modes.
llvm-svn: 360308
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/test/SemaTemplate/rdar9173693.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | clang/test/SemaTemplate/rdar9173693.cpp | 7 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/rdar9173693.cpp b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/rdar9173693.cpp index 86b49545a30..ed09a64a0dd 100644 --- a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/rdar9173693.cpp +++ b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/rdar9173693.cpp @@ -2,5 +2,8 @@ // <rdar://problem/9173693> template< bool C > struct assert { }; -template< bool > struct assert_arg_pred_impl { }; // expected-note 3 {{declared here}} -template< typename Pred > assert<false> assert_not_arg( void (*)(Pred), typename assert_arg_pred<Pred>::type ); // expected-error 5 {{}} +// FIXME: We diagnose the same problem multiple times here because we have no +// way to indicate in the token stream that we already tried to annotate a +// template-id and we failed. +template< bool > struct assert_arg_pred_impl { }; // expected-note 4 {{declared here}} +template< typename Pred > assert<false> assert_not_arg( void (*)(Pred), typename assert_arg_pred<Pred>::type ); // expected-error 6 {{}} |