Built-in equality and relational operators have return type "bool" in C++,

not "int".

Fix a typo in the promotion of enumeration types that was causing some
integral promotions to look like integral conversions (leading to
extra ambiguities in overload resolution).

Check for "acceptable" overloaded operators based on the types of the
arguments. This is a somewhat odd check that is specified by the
standard, but I can't see why it actually matters: the overload
candidates it suppresses don't seem like they would ever be picked as
the best candidates.

llvm-svn: 59583

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-operator.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-operator.cpp
index 71d949d750a..c540c2dafcb 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-operator.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-operator.cpp
@@ -48,3 +48,24 @@ struct B {
     make_A() == z;
   }
 };
+
+enum Enum1 { };
+enum Enum2 { };
+
+struct E1 {
+  E1(Enum1) { }
+};
+
+struct E2 {
+  E2(Enum2);
+};
+
+// C++ [over.match.oper]p3 - enum restriction.
+float& operator==(E1, E2); 
+
+void enum_test(Enum1 enum1, Enum2 enum2, E1 e1, E2 e2) {
+  float &f1 = (e1 == e2);
+  float &f2 = (enum1 == e2); 
+  float &f3 = (e1 == enum2); 
+  float &f4 = (enum1 == enum2);  // expected-error{{non-const reference to type 'float' cannot be initialized with a temporary of type '_Bool'}}
+}