Don't report ambiguities in the user-defined conversion if we weren't supposed

to be considering user-defined conversions in the first place.

Doug, please review;  I'm not sure what we should be doing if we see a real
ambiguity in selecting a copy constructor when otherwise suppressing
user-defined conversions.

Fixes PR6014.

llvm-svn: 93365

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/overload-call.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/overload-call.cpp
index 0a2508d4b80..acd1e50afe4 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/overload-call.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/overload-call.cpp
@@ -317,3 +317,19 @@ namespace test1 {
   }
 }
 
+// PR 6014
+namespace test2 {
+  struct QFixed {
+    QFixed(int i);
+    QFixed(long i);
+  };
+
+  bool operator==(const QFixed &f, int i);
+
+  class qrgb666 {
+    inline operator unsigned int () const;
+
+    inline bool operator==(const qrgb666 &v) const;
+    inline bool operator!=(const qrgb666 &v) const { return !(*this == v); }
+  };
+}