The paired 'operator delete' for a placement 'operator new' is always a

placement 'operator delete', even if there are no placement args (i.e.
overload resolution selected an operator new with default arguments).

llvm-svn: 113861

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
index ef20aee009c..f6129d19841 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
@@ -354,3 +354,21 @@ namespace DeleteParam {
     void operator delete(void* const);
   };
 }
+
+// <rdar://problem/8427878>
+// Test that the correct 'operator delete' is selected to pair with
+// the unexpected placement 'operator new'.
+namespace PairedDelete {
+  template <class T> struct A {
+    A();
+    void *operator new(size_t s, double d = 0);
+    void operator delete(void *p, double d);
+    void operator delete(void *p) {
+      T::dealloc(p);
+    }
+  };
+
+  A<int> *test() {
+    return new A<int>();
+  }
+}