Promote the warning about extra qualification on a declaration from a

warning to an error. C++ bans it, and both GCC and EDG diagnose it as
an error. Microsoft allows it, so we still warn in Microsoft
mode. Fixes <rdar://problem/11135644>.

llvm-svn: 163831

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
index b35e3822863..7239646d8d7 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ namespace N {
   void f();
   // FIXME: if we move this to a separate definition of N, things break!
 }
-void ::global_func2(int) { } // expected-warning{{extra qualification on member 'global_func2'}}
+void ::global_func2(int) { } // expected-error{{extra qualification on member 'global_func2'}}
 
 void N::f() { } // okay
 
@@ -245,15 +245,15 @@ namespace PR7133 {
 }
 
 class CLASS {
-  void CLASS::foo2(); // expected-warning {{extra qualification on member 'foo2'}}
+  void CLASS::foo2(); // expected-error {{extra qualification on member 'foo2'}}
 };
 
 namespace PR8159 {
   class B { };
 
   class A {
-    int A::a; // expected-warning{{extra qualification on member 'a'}}
-    static int A::b; // expected-warning{{extra qualification on member 'b'}}
+    int A::a; // expected-error{{extra qualification on member 'a'}}
+    static int A::b; // expected-error{{extra qualification on member 'b'}}
     int ::c; // expected-error{{non-friend class member 'c' cannot have a qualified name}}
   };
 }