Give nicer note when a member redeclaration has or lacks 'const'

llvm-svn: 141555

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
index 8e73c3e2ed3..e13030cc38a 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
@@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ int A::C::cx = 17;
 static int A::C::cx2 = 17; // expected-error{{'static' can}}
 
 class C2 {
-  void m(); // expected-note{{member declaration nearly matches}}
+  void m(); // expected-note{{member declaration does not match because it is not const qualified}}
 
   void f(const int& parm); // expected-note{{type of 1st parameter of member declaration does not match definition ('const int &' vs 'int')}}
-  void f(int) const; // expected-note{{member declaration nearly matches}}
+  void f(int) const; // expected-note{{member declaration does not match because it is const qualified}}
   void f(float);
 
   int x;
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ namespace E {
 
 
 class Operators {
-  Operators operator+(const Operators&) const; // expected-note{{member declaration nearly matches}}
+  Operators operator+(const Operators&) const; // expected-note{{member declaration does not match because it is const qualified}}
   operator bool();
 };