Take care another assert:

struct A {
  struct B;
};

struct A::B {
  void m() {} // Assertion failed: getContainingDC(DC) == CurContext && "The next DeclContext should be lexically contained in the current one."
};

Introduce DeclContext::getLexicalParent which may be different from DeclContext::getParent when nested-names are involved, e.g:

   namespace A {
      struct S;
   }
   struct A::S {}; // getParent() == namespace 'A'
                   // getLexicalParent() == translation unit

llvm-svn: 59650

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
index b22d8dc3d4d..18cb3b418a6 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
@@ -45,12 +45,19 @@ struct A::undef; // expected-error {{'undef' does not name a tag member in the s
 namespace A2 {
   typedef int INT;
   struct RC;
+  struct CC {
+    struct NC;
+  };
 }
 
 struct A2::RC {
   INT x;
 };
 
+struct A2::CC::NC {
+  void m() {}
+};
+
 void f3() {
   N::x = 0; // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'N'}}
   int N;