summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/clang/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRichard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>2017-01-07 00:48:55 +0000
committerRichard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>2017-01-07 00:48:55 +0000
commitd6a150829b04a63bdcc9bafe4fb7faa0e96a9df5 (patch)
tree005efe470ff275402614d3bbda5bb9036f67c11f /clang/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp
parent598861f661d90a87a4c6bec230b00386fa962da5 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-d6a150829b04a63bdcc9bafe4fb7faa0e96a9df5.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-d6a150829b04a63bdcc9bafe4fb7faa0e96a9df5.zip
PR23135: Don't instantiate constexpr functions referenced in unevaluated operands where possible.
This implements something like the current direction of DR1581: we use a narrow syntactic check to determine the set of places where a constant expression could be evaluated, and only instantiate a constexpr function or variable if it's referenced in one of those contexts, or is odr-used. It's not yet clear whether this is the right set of syntactic locations; we currently consider all contexts within templates that would result in odr-uses after instantiation, and contexts within list-initialization (narrowing conversions take another victim...), as requiring instantiation. We could in principle restrict the former cases more (only const integral / reference variable initializers, and contexts in which a constant expression is required, perhaps). However, this is sufficient to allow us to accept libstdc++ code, which relies on GCC's behavior (which appears to be somewhat similar to this approach). llvm-svn: 291318
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp')
-rw-r--r--clang/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp32
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp
index 12871b8ce70..fc86d1810ba 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp
@@ -16,34 +16,32 @@ namespace InClassInitializers {
// Noexcept::Noexcept is not declared constexpr, therefore noexcept(Noexcept())
// is false.
bool ThrowSomething() noexcept(false);
- struct ConstExpr { // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'b' needed}}
- bool b = noexcept(ConstExpr()) && ThrowSomething(); // expected-note {{declared here}}
- // expected-note@-1 {{implicit default constructor for 'InClassInitializers::ConstExpr' first required here}}
+ struct ConstExpr {
+ bool b = // expected-note {{declared here}}
+ noexcept(ConstExpr()) && ThrowSomething(); // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'b' needed}}
};
// Much more obviously broken: we can't parse the initializer without already
// knowing whether it produces a noexcept expression.
- struct TemplateArg { // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'n' needed}}
- int n = ExceptionIf<noexcept(TemplateArg())>::f(); // expected-note {{declared here}}
- // expected-note@-1 {{implicit default constructor for 'InClassInitializers::TemplateArg' first required here}}
+ struct TemplateArg {
+ int n = // expected-note {{declared here}}
+ ExceptionIf<noexcept(TemplateArg())>::f(); // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'n' needed}}
};
// And within a nested class.
- struct Nested { // expected-note {{implicit default constructor for 'InClassInitializers::Nested::Inner' first required here}}
- struct Inner { // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'n' needed}}
+ struct Nested {
+ struct Inner {
int n = // expected-note {{declared here}}
- ExceptionIf<noexcept(Nested())>::f(); // expected-note {{implicit default constructor for 'InClassInitializers::Nested' first required here}}
- } inner;
+ ExceptionIf<noexcept(Nested())>::f();
+ } inner; // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'n' needed}}
};
- struct Nested2 { // expected-error {{implicit default constructor for 'InClassInitializers::Nested2' must explicitly initialize the member 'inner' which does not have a default constructor}}
+ struct Nested2 {
struct Inner;
- int n = Inner().n; // expected-note {{implicit default constructor for 'InClassInitializers::Nested2::Inner' first required here}}
- struct Inner { // expected-error {{initializer for 'n' needed}} expected-note {{declared here}}
- // expected-note@+1 {{declared here}}
- int n = ExceptionIf<noexcept(Nested2())>::f();
- // expected-note@-1 {{implicit default constructor for 'InClassInitializers::Nested2' first required here}}
- } inner; // expected-note {{member is declared here}}
+ int n = Inner().n; // expected-error {{initializer for 'n' needed}}
+ struct Inner {
+ int n = ExceptionIf<noexcept(Nested2())>::f(); // expected-note {{declared here}}
+ } inner;
};
}
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud