[Sema] Don't assume that an initializer list has an initializer

Given something like 'int({}, 1)', we would try to emit a diagnostic
regarding the excess element in the scalar initializer.  However, we
assumed that the initializer list had an element in it.

llvm-svn: 234565

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/functional-cast.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/functional-cast.cpp
index f5ca76c38c0..9db95e80d03 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/functional-cast.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/functional-cast.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
 // REQUIRES: LP64
 
 // ------------ not interpreted as C-style cast ------------
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ struct InitViaConstructor {
   InitViaConstructor(int i = 7);
 };
 
-struct NoValueInit { // expected-note 2 {{candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor)}} 
+struct NoValueInit { // expected-note 2 {{candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor)}} expected-note 2 {{candidate constructor (the implicit move constructor)}}
   NoValueInit(int i, int j); // expected-note 2 {{candidate constructor}}
 };
 
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ void test_cxx_function_cast_multi() {
   (void)NoValueInit(0, 0);
   (void)NoValueInit(0, 0, 0); // expected-error{{no matching constructor for initialization}}
   (void)int(1, 2); // expected-error{{excess elements in scalar initializer}}
+  (void)int({}, 2);           // expected-error{{excess elements in scalar initializer}}
 }