DR259: Demote the pedantic error for an explicit instantiation after an

explicit specialization to a warning for C++98 mode (this is a defect report
resolution, so per our informal policy it should apply in C++98), and turn
the warning on by default for C++11 and later. In all cases where it fires, the
right thing to do is to remove the pointless explicit instantiation.

llvm-svn: 280308

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx1y-variable-templates_in_class.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx1y-variable-templates_in_class.cpp
index e2fbdfd6995..76f1bb9905b 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx1y-variable-templates_in_class.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx1y-variable-templates_in_class.cpp
@@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ namespace out_of_line {
     template<typename T, typename T0> static CONST T right = T(100);
     template<typename T> static CONST T right<T,int> = T(5);
   };
-  template<> CONST int B0::right<int,int> = 7;
-  template CONST int B0::right<int,int>;
-  template<> CONST int B0::right<int,float>;
-  template CONST int B0::right<int,float>;
+  template<> CONST int B0::right<int,int> = 7; // expected-note {{previous}}
+  template CONST int B0::right<int,int>; // expected-warning {{has no effect}}
+  template<> CONST int B0::right<int,float>; // expected-note {{previous}}
+  template CONST int B0::right<int,float>; // expected-warning {{has no effect}}
 
   class B1 {
     template<typename T, typename T0> static CONST T right;