When we are performing copy initialization of a class type via its

copy constructor, suppress user-defined conversions on the
argument. Otherwise, we can end up in a recursion loop where the
bind the argument of the copy constructor to another copy constructor call,
whose argument is then a copy constructor call...

Found by Boost.Regex which, alas, still isn't building.

llvm-svn: 102269

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp
index aa413232391..a812a5920d6 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
 struct ToBool { explicit operator bool(); };
 
 struct B;
-struct A { A(); A(const B&); }; // expected-note 2 {{candidate constructor}} \
-               // expected-note 2 {{candidate is the implicit copy constructor}}
+struct A { A(); A(const B&); }; // expected-note 2 {{candidate constructor}}
 struct B { operator A() const; }; // expected-note 2 {{candidate function}}
 struct I { operator int(); };
 struct J { operator I(); };