Revert r301785 (and r301787) because they caused PR32864.

The fix is that ExprEvaluatorBase::VisitInitListExpr should handle transparent exprs instead of exprs with one element. Fixing that uncovers one testcase failure because the AST for "constexpr _Complex float test2 = {1};" is wrong (the _Complex prvalue should not be const-qualified), and a number of test failures in test/OpenMP where the captured stmt contains an InitListExpr that is in syntactic form.

llvm-svn: 301891

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/Sema/integer-overflow.c b/clang/test/Sema/integer-overflow.c
index b2b7903e516..62ee33e3d18 100644
--- a/clang/test/Sema/integer-overflow.c
+++ b/clang/test/Sema/integer-overflow.c
@@ -149,16 +149,16 @@ uint64_t check_integer_overflows(int i) {
 
 // expected-warning@+2 {{overflow in expression; result is 536870912 with type 'int'}}
   uint64_t *b;
-  (void)b[4608 * 1024 * 1024];
+  uint64_t b2 = b[4608 * 1024 * 1024] + 1;
 
 // expected-warning@+1 2{{overflow in expression; result is 536870912 with type 'int'}}
-  (void)(i ? (4608 * 1024 * 1024) : (4608 * 1024 * 1024));
+  int j1 = i ? (4608 * 1024 * 1024) : (4608 * 1024 * 1024);
 
 // expected-warning@+1 {{overflow in expression; result is 536870912 with type 'int'}}
-  (void)(-(4608 * 1024 * 1024));
+  int j2 = -(4608 * 1024 * 1024);
 
 // expected-warning@+1 {{overflow in expression; result is 536870912 with type 'int'}}
-  (void)b[4608 * 1024 * 1024];
+  uint64_t j3 = b[4608 * 1024 * 1024];
 
 // expected-warning@+1 2{{overflow in expression; result is 536870912 with type 'int'}}
   return ((4608 * 1024 * 1024) + ((uint64_t)(4608 * 1024 * 1024)));