diff options
| author | Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> | 2009-04-14 21:16:09 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> | 2009-04-14 21:16:09 +0000 |
| commit | a723ba97db0e47f024118fa9f132d307dcfc75d4 (patch) | |
| tree | 93a2cc3522269080e30dbfe1a98e130738cf51e5 /clang/test/Sema/implicit-int.c | |
| parent | 5196c618fb579ac135eccffd5f5867572d2ec372 (diff) | |
| download | bcm5719-llvm-a723ba97db0e47f024118fa9f132d307dcfc75d4.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-a723ba97db0e47f024118fa9f132d307dcfc75d4.zip | |
Fix a regression in a previous patch that broke implicit
int in a bitfield. Shantonu found this in a gcc testsuite file.
llvm-svn: 69074
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/test/Sema/implicit-int.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | clang/test/Sema/implicit-int.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/clang/test/Sema/implicit-int.c b/clang/test/Sema/implicit-int.c index 71a5724a1ff..90fe607e120 100644 --- a/clang/test/Sema/implicit-int.c +++ b/clang/test/Sema/implicit-int.c @@ -22,3 +22,11 @@ h19_insline(n) // expected-warning {{parameter 'n' was not declared, defaulting ILPAD(); // expected-warning {{type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'}} } +struct foo { + __extension__ __attribute__((packed)) // expected-warning {{type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'}} + x : 4; +}; + + + + |
