diff options
author | Daniel Dunbar <daniel@zuster.org> | 2010-04-22 16:14:54 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Dunbar <daniel@zuster.org> | 2010-04-22 16:14:54 +0000 |
commit | f812506912d7432acde766d1ee93205843e5817c (patch) | |
tree | 9307b741280124e7d5eb2daba1535bd79d0faab5 /clang/test/Sema/arm-layout.c | |
parent | 5981377698591b640c9abf1e79cc11a803c43fe3 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-f812506912d7432acde766d1ee93205843e5817c.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-f812506912d7432acde766d1ee93205843e5817c.zip |
ARM/APCS: Don't respect bit-field types when laying out structures.
- This fixes the last known ABI issues with ARM/APCS.
- I've run the first 1k ABITests with '--no-unsigned --no-vector --no-complex'
on {armv6, armv7} x {-mno-thumb, -mthumb}, and the first 10k tests for armv7
-mthumb, for both function return types and single argument calls. These all
pass now (they failed horribly before without --no-bitfield).
llvm-svn: 102070
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/test/Sema/arm-layout.c')
-rw-r--r-- | clang/test/Sema/arm-layout.c | 49 |
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/clang/test/Sema/arm-layout.c b/clang/test/Sema/arm-layout.c index 1e239d275a8..42486851042 100644 --- a/clang/test/Sema/arm-layout.c +++ b/clang/test/Sema/arm-layout.c @@ -1,20 +1,53 @@ // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple armv7-unknown-unknown -target-abi apcs-gnu %s -verify // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple armv7-unknown-unknown -target-abi aapcs %s -verify -#ifdef __ARM_EABI__ +#define check(name, cond) int _##name##_check[(cond) ? 1 : -1] struct s0 { char field0; double field1; }; -int g0[sizeof(struct s0) == 16 ? 1 : -1]; +#ifdef __ARM_EABI__ +check(s0_size, sizeof(struct s0) == 16); +#else +check(s0_size, sizeof(struct s0) == 12); +#endif struct s1 { char field0; long double field1; }; -int g1[sizeof(struct s1) == 16 ? 1 : -1]; - +#ifdef __ARM_EABI__ +check(s1_size, sizeof(struct s1) == 16); #else +check(s1_size, sizeof(struct s1) == 12); +#endif -struct s0 { char field0; double field1; }; -int g0[sizeof(struct s0) == 12 ? 1 : -1]; +struct s2 { + short field0; + int field1 : 24; + char field2; +}; +#ifdef __ARM_EABI__ +check(s2_size, sizeof(struct s2) == 8); +check(s2_offset_0, __builtin_offsetof(struct s2, field0) == 0); +check(s2_offset_1, __builtin_offsetof(struct s2, field2) == 7); +#else +check(s2_size, sizeof(struct s2) == 6); +check(s2_offset_0, __builtin_offsetof(struct s2, field0) == 0); +check(s2_offset_1, __builtin_offsetof(struct s2, field2) == 5); +#endif -struct s1 { char field0; long double field1; }; -int g1[sizeof(struct s1) == 12 ? 1 : -1]; +struct s3 { + short field0; + int field1 : 24 __attribute__((aligned(4))); + char field2; +}; +check(s3_size, sizeof(struct s3) == 8); +check(s3_offset_0, __builtin_offsetof(struct s3, field0) == 0); +check(s3_offset_1, __builtin_offsetof(struct s3, field2) == 7); +struct s4 { + int field0 : 4 +}; +#ifdef __ARM_EABI__ +check(s4_size, sizeof(struct s4) == 4); +check(s4_align, __alignof(struct s4) == 4); +#else +check(s4_size, sizeof(struct s4) == 1); +check(s4_align, __alignof(struct s4) == 1); #endif |