diff options
author | Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl@gmail.com> | 2019-04-23 17:04:15 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl@gmail.com> | 2019-04-23 17:04:15 +0000 |
commit | 3234887fe2ea94d5997b4ba9999401459a29905b (patch) | |
tree | 843fa6636935b50c1cf5a6871a8b19fefc91332e /clang/test/OpenMP/taskloop_simd_simdlen_messages.cpp | |
parent | bdb864a5762e10a485c0b76c5677f5c14b4045d7 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-3234887fe2ea94d5997b4ba9999401459a29905b.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-3234887fe2ea94d5997b4ba9999401459a29905b.zip |
[APSInt][OpenMP] Fix isNegative, etc. for unsigned types
Without this patch, APSInt inherits APInt::isNegative, which merely
checks the sign bit without regard to whether the type is actually
signed. isNonNegative and isStrictlyPositive call isNegative and so
are also affected.
This patch adjusts APSInt to override isNegative, isNonNegative, and
isStrictlyPositive with implementations that consider whether the type
is signed.
A large set of Clang OpenMP tests are affected. Without this patch,
these tests assume that `true` is not a valid argument for clauses
like `collapse`. Indeed, `true` fails APInt::isStrictlyPositive but
not APSInt::isStrictlyPositive. This patch adjusts those tests to
assume `true` should be accepted.
This patch also adds tests revealing various other similar fixes due
to APSInt::isNegative calls in Clang's ExprConstant.cpp and
SemaExpr.cpp: `++` and `--` overflow in `constexpr`, evaluated object
size based on `alloc_size`, `<<` and `>>` shift count validation, and
OpenMP array section validation.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, ABataev, hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59712
llvm-svn: 359012
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/test/OpenMP/taskloop_simd_simdlen_messages.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | clang/test/OpenMP/taskloop_simd_simdlen_messages.cpp | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/clang/test/OpenMP/taskloop_simd_simdlen_messages.cpp b/clang/test/OpenMP/taskloop_simd_simdlen_messages.cpp index 4170d012dd5..75d9a1d360b 100644 --- a/clang/test/OpenMP/taskloop_simd_simdlen_messages.cpp +++ b/clang/test/OpenMP/taskloop_simd_simdlen_messages.cpp @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ T tmain(T argc, S **argv) { //expected-note 2 {{declared here}} #pragma omp taskloop simd simdlen ((ST > 0) ? 1 + ST : 2) for (int i = ST; i < N; i++) argv[0][i] = argv[0][i] - argv[0][i-ST]; // expected-error@+6 2 {{directive '#pragma omp taskloop simd' cannot contain more than one 'simdlen' clause}} - // expected-error@+5 2 {{argument to 'simdlen' clause must be a strictly positive integer value}} + // expected-error@+5 {{argument to 'simdlen' clause must be a strictly positive integer value}} // expected-error@+4 2 {{expression is not an integral constant expression}} #if __cplusplus >= 201103L // expected-note@+2 2 {{non-constexpr function 'foobool' cannot be used in a constant expression}} @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) { // expected-note@+4 {{non-constexpr function 'foobool' cannot be used in a constant expression}} #endif // expected-error@+2 2 {{directive '#pragma omp taskloop simd' cannot contain more than one 'simdlen' clause}} - // expected-error@+1 2 {{argument to 'simdlen' clause must be a strictly positive integer value}} + // expected-error@+1 {{argument to 'simdlen' clause must be a strictly positive integer value}} #pragma omp taskloop simd simdlen (foobool(argc)), simdlen (true), simdlen (-5) for (int i = 4; i < 12; i++) argv[0][i] = argv[0][i] - argv[0][i-4]; #pragma omp taskloop simd simdlen (S1) // expected-error {{'S1' does not refer to a value}} |