summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorReid Kleckner <reid@kleckner.net>2013-10-08 00:58:57 +0000
committerReid Kleckner <reid@kleckner.net>2013-10-08 00:58:57 +0000
commit9a7f3e61a95ff42d1984b3c9aede2b1dd90c2adf (patch)
treea350b4e0099da49573bda4a82ef14ef859574286 /clang/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms.cpp
parent094546836bed638d03e687d83b2682dfb3adf8f6 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-9a7f3e61a95ff42d1984b3c9aede2b1dd90c2adf.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-9a7f3e61a95ff42d1984b3c9aede2b1dd90c2adf.zip
[ms-cxxabi] Fix the calling convention for operator new in records
Summary: Operator new, new[], delete, and delete[] are all implicitly static when declared inside a record. CXXMethodDecl already knows this, but we need to account for that before we pick the calling convention for the function type. Fixes PR17371. Reviewers: rsmith CC: cfe-commits Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1761 llvm-svn: 192150
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms.cpp')
-rw-r--r--clang/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms.cpp52
1 files changed, 52 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms.cpp b/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms.cpp
index fd7c605c99f..42d574fa53e 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms.cpp
@@ -304,3 +304,55 @@ inline int templated_inline_function_with_local_type() {
int call_templated_inline_function_with_local_type() {
return templated_inline_function_with_local_type<int>();
}
+
+// PR17371
+struct OverloadedNewDelete {
+ // __cdecl
+ void *operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__);
+ void *operator new[](__SIZE_TYPE__);
+ void operator delete(void *);
+ void operator delete[](void *);
+ // __thiscall
+ int operator+(int);
+};
+
+void *OverloadedNewDelete::operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__ s) { return 0; }
+void *OverloadedNewDelete::operator new[](__SIZE_TYPE__ s) { return 0; }
+void OverloadedNewDelete::operator delete(void *) { }
+void OverloadedNewDelete::operator delete[](void *) { }
+int OverloadedNewDelete::operator+(int x) { return x; };
+
+// CHECK-DAG: ??2OverloadedNewDelete@@SAPAXI@Z
+// CHECK-DAG: ??_UOverloadedNewDelete@@SAPAXI@Z
+// CHECK-DAG: ??3OverloadedNewDelete@@SAXPAX@Z
+// CHECK-DAG: ??_VOverloadedNewDelete@@SAXPAX@Z
+// CHECK-DAG: ??HOverloadedNewDelete@@QAEHH@Z
+
+// X64-DAG: ??2OverloadedNewDelete@@SAPEAX_K@Z
+// X64-DAG: ??_UOverloadedNewDelete@@SAPEAX_K@Z
+// X64-DAG: ??3OverloadedNewDelete@@SAXPEAX@Z
+// X64-DAG: ??_VOverloadedNewDelete@@SAXPEAX@Z
+// X64-DAG: ??HOverloadedNewDelete@@QEAAHH@Z
+
+// Indirecting the function type through a typedef will require a calling
+// convention adjustment before building the method decl.
+
+typedef void *__thiscall OperatorNewType(__SIZE_TYPE__);
+typedef void __thiscall OperatorDeleteType(void *);
+
+struct TypedefNewDelete {
+ OperatorNewType operator new;
+ OperatorNewType operator new[];
+ OperatorDeleteType operator delete;
+ OperatorDeleteType operator delete[];
+};
+
+void *TypedefNewDelete::operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__ s) { return 0; }
+void *TypedefNewDelete::operator new[](__SIZE_TYPE__ s) { return 0; }
+void TypedefNewDelete::operator delete(void *) { }
+void TypedefNewDelete::operator delete[](void *) { }
+
+// CHECK-DAG: ??2TypedefNewDelete@@SAPAXI@Z
+// CHECK-DAG: ??_UTypedefNewDelete@@SAPAXI@Z
+// CHECK-DAG: ??3TypedefNewDelete@@SAXPAX@Z
+// CHECK-DAG: ??_VTypedefNewDelete@@SAXPAX@Z
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud