[Sema] Allow unmarked overloadable functions.

This patch extends the `overloadable` attribute to allow for one
function with a given name to not be marked with the `overloadable`
attribute. The overload without the `overloadable` attribute will not
have its name mangled.

So, the following code is now legal:

  void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable));
  void foo(int);
  void foo(float) __attribute__((overloadable));

In addition, this patch fixes a bug where we'd accept code with
`__attribute__((overloadable))` inconsistently applied. In other words,
we used to accept:

  void foo(void);
  void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable));

But we will do this no longer, since it defeats the original purpose of
requiring `__attribute__((overloadable))` on all redeclarations of a
function.

This breakage seems to not be an issue in practice, since the only code
I could find that had this pattern often looked like:

  void foo(void);
  void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable)) __asm__("foo");
  void foo(int) __attribute__((overloadable));

...Which can now be simplified by simply removing the asm label and
overloadable attribute from the redeclaration of `void foo(void);`

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32332

llvm-svn: 306467

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/mangle-ms.c b/clang/test/CodeGen/mangle-ms.c
index 0ad43d5e06c..042c72e6d79 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/mangle-ms.c
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/mangle-ms.c
@@ -2,3 +2,12 @@
 
 // CHECK: define void @"\01?f@@$$J0YAXP6AX@Z@Z"
 __attribute__((overloadable)) void f(void (*x)()) {}
+
+// CHECK: define void @f
+void f(void (*x)(int)) {}
+
+// CHECK: define void @g
+void g(void (*x)(int)) {}
+
+// CHECK: define void @"\01?g@@$$J0YAXP6AX@Z@Z"
+__attribute__((overloadable)) void g(void (*x)()) {}