[analyzer] Re-enable constructors when lifetime extension through fields occurs.

Temporary object constructor inlining was disabled in r326240 for code like

    const int &x = A().x;

because automatic destructor for the lifetime-extended object A() was not
working correctly in CFG.

CFG was fixed in r333941, so inlining can be re-enabled. CFG for lifetime
extension through aggregates still needs to be fixed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44239

llvm-svn: 333946

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/Analysis/lifetime-extension.cpp b/clang/test/Analysis/lifetime-extension.cpp
index 9173129ac14..1bad166d2d8 100644
--- a/clang/test/Analysis/lifetime-extension.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/Analysis/lifetime-extension.cpp
@@ -46,10 +46,18 @@ void f() {
   const int &y = A().j[1]; // no-crash
   const int &z = (A().j[1], A().j[0]); // no-crash
 
-  // FIXME: All of these should be TRUE, but constructors aren't inlined.
-  clang_analyzer_eval(x == 1); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
-  clang_analyzer_eval(y == 3); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
-  clang_analyzer_eval(z == 2); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
+  clang_analyzer_eval(x == 1);
+  clang_analyzer_eval(y == 3);
+  clang_analyzer_eval(z == 2);
+#ifdef TEMPORARIES
+  // expected-warning@-4{{TRUE}}
+  // expected-warning@-4{{TRUE}}
+  // expected-warning@-4{{TRUE}}
+#else
+  // expected-warning@-8{{UNKNOWN}}
+  // expected-warning@-8{{UNKNOWN}}
+  // expected-warning@-8{{UNKNOWN}}
+#endif
 }
 } // end namespace pr19539_crash_on_destroying_an_integer
 
@@ -144,8 +152,12 @@ void f5() {
   {
     const bool &x = C(true, &after, &before).x; // no-crash
   }
-  // FIXME: Should be TRUE. Should not warn about garbage value.
-  clang_analyzer_eval(after == before); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
+  clang_analyzer_eval(after == before);
+#ifdef TEMPORARIES
+  // expected-warning@-2{{TRUE}}
+#else
+  // expected-warning@-4{{UNKNOWN}}
+#endif
 }
 
 struct A { // A is an aggregate.