Fixed layout of test/ASTMerge.

As outlined in a previous RFC, the test/ASTMerge/Inputs folder is getting full and the tests are starting to become interdependent. This is undesirable because

- it makes it harder to write new tests
- it makes it harder to figure out at a glance what old tests are doing, and
- it adds the risk of breaking one test while changing a different one, because of the interdependencies.

To fix this, according to the conversation in the RFC, I have changed the layout from

a.c
Inputs/a1.c
Inputs/a2.c

to

a/test.c
a/Inputs/a1.c
a/Inputs/a2.c
for all existing tests. I have also eliminated interdependencies by replicating the input files for each test that uses them.

https://reviews.llvm.org/D26571

llvm-svn: 287129

1 files changed, 63 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/clang/test/ASTMerge/struct/Inputs/struct1.c b/clang/test/ASTMerge/struct/Inputs/struct1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..af2af8abc42
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/ASTMerge/struct/Inputs/struct1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+typedef int Int;
+typedef float Float;
+
+// Matches
+struct S0 {
+  Int field1;
+  Float field2;
+};
+
+struct S0 x0;
+
+// Mismatch in field type
+struct S1 {
+  Int field1;
+  int field2;
+};
+
+struct S1 x1;
+
+// Mismatch in tag kind.
+struct S2 { int i; float f; } x2;
+
+// Missing fields
+struct S3 { int i; float f; double d; } x3;
+
+// Extra fields
+struct S4 { int i; } x4;
+
+// Bit-field matches
+struct S5 { int i : 8; unsigned j : 8; } x5;
+
+// Bit-field mismatch
+struct S6 { int i : 8; unsigned j : 8; } x6;
+
+// Bit-field mismatch
+struct S7 { int i : 8; unsigned j : 8; } x7;
+
+// Incomplete type
+struct S8 *x8;
+
+// Incomplete type
+struct S9 { int i; float f; } *x9;
+
+// Incomplete type
+struct S10 *x10;
+
+// Matches
+struct ListNode {
+  int value;
+  struct ListNode *Next;
+} xList;
+
+// Mismatch due to struct used internally
+struct DeepError {
+  int value;
+  struct DeeperError { int i; int f; } *Deeper;
+} xDeep;
+
+// Matches
+struct {
+  Int i;
+  float f;
+} x11;