[analyzer] pr38273: Legalize Loc<>NonLoc comparison symbols.

Remove an assertion in RangeConstraintManager that expects such symbols to never
appear, while admitting that the constraint manager doesn't yet handle them.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49703

llvm-svn: 337769

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
index 1d2b94d6f76..e8c7bdbde38 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
@@ -343,9 +343,11 @@ bool RangeConstraintManager::canReasonAbout(SVal X) const {
       if (BinaryOperator::isEqualityOp(SSE->getOpcode()) ||
           BinaryOperator::isRelationalOp(SSE->getOpcode())) {
         // We handle Loc <> Loc comparisons, but not (yet) NonLoc <> NonLoc.
+        // We've recently started producing Loc <> NonLoc comparisons (that
+        // result from casts of one of the operands between eg. intptr_t and
+        // void *), but we can't reason about them yet.
         if (Loc::isLocType(SSE->getLHS()->getType())) {
-          assert(Loc::isLocType(SSE->getRHS()->getType()));
-          return true;
+          return Loc::isLocType(SSE->getRHS()->getType());
         }
       }
     }