[analyzer][NFC] Fix inconsistent references to checkers as "checks"

Traditionally, clang-tidy uses the term check, and the analyzer uses checker,
but in the very early years, this wasn't the case, and code originating from the
early 2010's still incorrectly refer to checkers as checks.

This patch attempts to hunt down most of these, aiming to refer to checkers as
checkers, but preserve references to callback functions (like checkPreCall) as
checks.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67140

llvm-svn: 371760

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineCXX.cpp
index 83303d722f2..058be985540 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineCXX.cpp
@@ -775,7 +775,8 @@ void ExprEngine::VisitCXXNewExpr(const CXXNewExpr *CNE, ExplodedNode *Pred,
   if (!AMgr.getAnalyzerOptions().MayInlineCXXAllocator) {
     // Invalidate placement args.
     // FIXME: Once we figure out how we want allocators to work,
-    // we should be using the usual pre-/(default-)eval-/post-call checks here.
+    // we should be using the usual pre-/(default-)eval-/post-call checkers
+    // here.
     State = Call->invalidateRegions(blockCount);
     if (!State)
       return;