summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHenry Wong <movietravelcode@outlook.com>2018-03-06 12:29:09 +0000
committerHenry Wong <movietravelcode@outlook.com>2018-03-06 12:29:09 +0000
commite47b89d1f866ae78034026c6477638dbcd48f025 (patch)
treeeb998f12bd3a989996925f44263a0de66e31291a /clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
parent5e5dd7067490cd98549a2015b7a521c862e68fd6 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-e47b89d1f866ae78034026c6477638dbcd48f025.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-e47b89d1f866ae78034026c6477638dbcd48f025.zip
[Analyzer] More accurate modeling about the increment operator of the operand with type bool.
Summary: There is a problem with analyzer that a wrong value is given when modeling the increment operator of the operand with type bool. After `rL307604` is applied, a unsigned overflow may occur. Example: ``` void func() { bool b = true; // unsigned overflow occur, 2 -> 0 U1b b++; } ``` The use of an operand of type bool with the ++ operators is deprecated but valid untill C++17. And if the operand of the increment operator is of type bool, it is set to true. This patch includes two parts: - If the operand of the increment operator is of type bool or type _Bool, set to true. - Modify `BasicValueFactory::getTruthValue()`, use `getIntWidth()` instead `getTypeSize()` and use `unsigned` instead `signed`. Reviewers: alexshap, NoQ, dcoughlin, george.karpenkov Reviewed By: NoQ Subscribers: xazax.hun, szepet, a.sidorin, cfe-commits, MTC Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43741 llvm-svn: 326776
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp')
-rw-r--r--clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp11
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
index c3c1cb93fde..55ee2cefc91 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
@@ -1066,6 +1066,7 @@ void ExprEngine::VisitIncrementDecrementOperator(const UnaryOperator* U,
// constant value. If the UnaryOperator has location type, create the
// constant with int type and pointer width.
SVal RHS;
+ SVal Result;
if (U->getType()->isAnyPointerType())
RHS = svalBuilder.makeArrayIndex(1);
@@ -1074,7 +1075,14 @@ void ExprEngine::VisitIncrementDecrementOperator(const UnaryOperator* U,
else
RHS = UnknownVal();
- SVal Result = evalBinOp(state, Op, V2, RHS, U->getType());
+ // The use of an operand of type bool with the ++ operators is deprecated
+ // but valid until C++17. And if the operand of the ++ operator is of type
+ // bool, it is set to true until C++17. Note that for '_Bool', it is also
+ // set to true when it encounters ++ operator.
+ if (U->getType()->isBooleanType() && U->isIncrementOp())
+ Result = svalBuilder.makeTruthVal(true, U->getType());
+ else
+ Result = evalBinOp(state, Op, V2, RHS, U->getType());
// Conjure a new symbol if necessary to recover precision.
if (Result.isUnknown()){
@@ -1096,7 +1104,6 @@ void ExprEngine::VisitIncrementDecrementOperator(const UnaryOperator* U,
Constraint = svalBuilder.evalEQ(state, SymVal,
svalBuilder.makeZeroVal(U->getType()));
-
state = state->assume(Constraint, false);
assert(state);
}
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud