diff options
author | Henry Wong <movietravelcode@outlook.com> | 2018-03-06 12:29:09 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Henry Wong <movietravelcode@outlook.com> | 2018-03-06 12:29:09 +0000 |
commit | e47b89d1f866ae78034026c6477638dbcd48f025 (patch) | |
tree | eb998f12bd3a989996925f44263a0de66e31291a /clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp | |
parent | 5e5dd7067490cd98549a2015b7a521c862e68fd6 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-e47b89d1f866ae78034026c6477638dbcd48f025.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-e47b89d1f866ae78034026c6477638dbcd48f025.zip |
[Analyzer] More accurate modeling about the increment operator of the operand with type bool.
Summary:
There is a problem with analyzer that a wrong value is given when modeling the increment operator of the operand with type bool. After `rL307604` is applied, a unsigned overflow may occur.
Example:
```
void func() {
bool b = true;
// unsigned overflow occur, 2 -> 0 U1b
b++;
}
```
The use of an operand of type bool with the ++ operators is deprecated but valid untill C++17. And if the operand of the increment operator is of type bool, it is set to true.
This patch includes two parts:
- If the operand of the increment operator is of type bool or type _Bool, set to true.
- Modify `BasicValueFactory::getTruthValue()`, use `getIntWidth()` instead `getTypeSize()` and use `unsigned` instead `signed`.
Reviewers: alexshap, NoQ, dcoughlin, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: xazax.hun, szepet, a.sidorin, cfe-commits, MTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43741
llvm-svn: 326776
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp | 11 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp index c3c1cb93fde..55ee2cefc91 100644 --- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp @@ -1066,6 +1066,7 @@ void ExprEngine::VisitIncrementDecrementOperator(const UnaryOperator* U, // constant value. If the UnaryOperator has location type, create the // constant with int type and pointer width. SVal RHS; + SVal Result; if (U->getType()->isAnyPointerType()) RHS = svalBuilder.makeArrayIndex(1); @@ -1074,7 +1075,14 @@ void ExprEngine::VisitIncrementDecrementOperator(const UnaryOperator* U, else RHS = UnknownVal(); - SVal Result = evalBinOp(state, Op, V2, RHS, U->getType()); + // The use of an operand of type bool with the ++ operators is deprecated + // but valid until C++17. And if the operand of the ++ operator is of type + // bool, it is set to true until C++17. Note that for '_Bool', it is also + // set to true when it encounters ++ operator. + if (U->getType()->isBooleanType() && U->isIncrementOp()) + Result = svalBuilder.makeTruthVal(true, U->getType()); + else + Result = evalBinOp(state, Op, V2, RHS, U->getType()); // Conjure a new symbol if necessary to recover precision. if (Result.isUnknown()){ @@ -1096,7 +1104,6 @@ void ExprEngine::VisitIncrementDecrementOperator(const UnaryOperator* U, Constraint = svalBuilder.evalEQ(state, SymVal, svalBuilder.makeZeroVal(U->getType())); - state = state->assume(Constraint, false); assert(state); } |